It's ALL about manufacturing "victories for DIVERSITY"...
Until seeing the latest rookie free-agent signings....This is the one team that could have 27 white players on the 53-man roster. Is this an unspoken that is not allowed by the PTB?
This is why MLB needed to be "latino-ized".. this is why White
stud basketball players' are rarely paired together on the same NBA team(s).. Perhaps, it's why Greg Olsen was traded to the Panthers and not another team..
White athletes' are purposely "kept separated" so as not to give the general population any ideas or racial pride. "Victories" are being manufactured for black/latino teams, because it serves to transform them into a place/realm of
importance, where they become "heroes," and, then, somehow
essential to the fiber of America, England, Canada, etc.
Even if they were WGAs (which they aren't), that doesn't extend to business, science, crucial trades, or creating/maintaining civilization, but that doesn't stop the PTB from pushing for more blacks as head coaches and more "black athletes" into politics. This is all part of the agenda.
--A really dark team could become Whiter, but, for the last few years, I never expect that a "Whiter" team will become Whiter. It would be an exercise in futility. In the past, I have been critical of teams' like New England (for drafting Brandon Spikes, Ron Brace, etc) and Green Bay, for shying away from White TEs and mostly shunning White DL. I will remain critical when necessary; I don't have White guilt, and when I see (available) White athletes' that are way-better than the blacks that are being signed, I will point that out.--