Black school's white AD plays race card..

foreverfree

Mentor
Joined
Nov 7, 2004
Messages
902
... with in-state rival for refusing to play his school on the gridiron

http://delawareonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/2006090 7/NEWS/609070371/1006/NEWS

DSU official calls UD's refusal to play racist
Blue Hens, Hornets yet to meet in football
By KEVIN TRESOLINI, The News Journal
Posted Thursday, September 7, 2006
The University of Delaware and Delaware State University football teams play Saturday night. They just won't be playing each other.

They never have met on the football field and are not scheduled to at any time in the future despite the schools' proximity and membership in NCAA Division I-AA.

Chuck Bell, who became DSU's athletic director last year, said he knows exactly why the two schools haven't played.

"I'm convinced the basis is racism," said Bell, the first white athletic director in DSU history. "UD is a white school and DSU is a historically black school, and it's one of those things left over from the days of separate restrooms and separate seating areas."

Both universities owe their histories to the Morrill Land-Grant College Act of 1862. Delaware College, which had previously operated under other names, reopened in 1870. It later became UD.

The State College for Colored Students, now DSU, was established in 1891 under a provision of the Morrill Act passed a year earlier for states, such as Delaware, that maintained segregated educational facilities.

All Delaware schools were segregated until the 1950s.

"I can't change history," Bell said.

At the beginning of the 2005-06 school year, 5.6 percent of UD's undergraduate students were black, while approximately 18 percent of DSU's were white. Blacks make up 20.4 percent of the Delaware population, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.

About one-third of UD's players on this year's team are black and DSU has some white players.

Told of Bell's comments, UD Athletic Director Edgar Johnson would not respond specifically on the subject of racial bias. As for the lack of a UD-DSU football game, he repeated what he has often said throughout his 22 years as athletic director.

"I'm sure it will happen someday," Johnson said.

When, he does not know. UD's nonconference schedule is set through at least 2009, with some opponents, including Saturday's foe West Chester (Pa.) University, penciled into the next decade as well. Future UD schedules do include non- or limited-scholarship I-AA programs State University of New York at Albany (this year and 2008) and Monmouth University in New Jersey (2007), but not DSU, which, like UD, is permitted to award as many as 63 football scholarships.

Johnson has frequently said UD has difficulty finding nonconference opposition but simply prefers to play schools other than DSU.

"You can make all kinds of excuses, and they're all lame," Bell said. "I don't buy any of them."

West Chester, an NCAA Division II school located about 45 minutes from Newark, has been on UD's football schedule every year since 1968. The schools have a long athletic and academic association, but are not as similar now as they were in 1968. UD and West Chester used to be rivals in nearly every sport. Now, they rarely compete outside of football.

UD and DSU, Division I in all sports, had only gone head-to-head in large track and field relay meets before the men's basketball teams broke the ice -- and the color barrier -- in December 1991. They have since met in several other sports, but not football, the one that matters the most at UD.

Many state residents and alumni, some from out of state, have clamored for a UD-DSU matchup and been befuddled by UD's stubborn resistance to make it happen. At times, politicians have suggested using the government to try and force the two state-supported schools to play, but nothing has ever been done.

Bell worked at Colorado State when it played Colorado of the Big 12 and at San Jose State when it played nearby Pac-10 member Stanford in football. Bell said, "Stanford would not even think about not playing us."

UD-DSU, he has found, is another matter.

"It's absolutely foreign to me that we don't play," said Bell, who has broached the subject with Johnson briefly and unsuccessfully. "It doesn't make any sense financially, competitively and from a rivalry standpoint not to play.

"I've been an athletic administrator 37 years and I'm 61 years old and I've never seen anything like it."

[end of article]

JohnEdited by: foreverfree
 

dirk41

Newbie
Joined
Feb 20, 2006
Messages
26
About one-third of UD's players on this year's team are black and DSU has some white players.

LOL at this comment.what's "some" white players...3 or 4?
 

Colonel_Reb

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 9, 2005
Messages
13,987
Location
The Deep South
I expect they have white kickers and punters, and maybe a couple of O-linemen and a QB. I'll tell you what, I'll check right now and see if I'm right.

A few minutes later...

These are the whites on DSU's team:
QB-Kurt Elden
K-Peter Gaertner
K-Giovanni Grassi
OL-Nick Richmond
FB-Adam Shrewsbury
P-Josh Brite
OL-Mike Maloney

I'm almost sure there are a couple more white o-linemen that I couldn't find pics of. Anyway, taking those, that makes 9 out of an 83 man roster, so about 11%. I guess it would be almost all white versus almost all black. Tell you the truth, I bet UD starts more than 30% blacks. Blacks are always more likely to play than whites because of the Caste System, so with a 30& black roster, I'd say at over 30% of the 22 regular starters are black. Maybe I'll look into that too if I can find a depth chart for them.
 

Colonel_Reb

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 9, 2005
Messages
13,987
Location
The Deep South
UD will have 3 black starters on offense and 5 on defense tomorrow. So, 8 out of 22 is a little over 36%. Yep, I knew it. The glorious Caste System at work!
smiley24.gif
 

Poacher

Mentor
Joined
Jul 30, 2005
Messages
943
I always love when whites play the "you're a racist and I'm not" card on their fellow whites. I think it is sickening and cowardly.

People fling baseless charges of racism around like manhole covers these days. It should be a crime. It cost Chuck Bell absolutely nothing to make this charge and get himself in the paper and the media gladly puts the onus on DU as if Bell's ruminations are correct. I think DU was right not to respond to the charges of racism. On the contrary Chuck Bell needs to be made to come up with some kind of proof.

The fact that the schools don't play is not evidence of racism. Bell's argument is fallacious. His point is a tautology as in; why doesn't DU play DSU? because DU is racist...how do you know DU is racist? because they won't play DSU. Hey Chuck, is the sky blue because it reflects the ocean or is the ocean blue because it reflects the sky? Unfortunately, this type of thinking or should I say anti-thinking is common these days. Ever since the '91 civil rights act was signed into law with it's proportional representation nonsense logic has fallen by the wayside (but of course it stated earlier than that, the '91 act just help accelerate things). In its place we have the Chuck Bells of the world screeching about racism saying "it's the only thing I can think of...."

God what a self-righteous jerk.

I'm rambling like a banshee.
 
Top