Counter Protest
- Thread starter KG2422
- Start date
Muchos Gracias Senor Jorge, or should I say Benedict Arnold ---Ha ha ha ha, that's a good one. I congratulate you and the treacherous American Congress. You have done what an army could not do. Without a shot fired, you have surrendered your land, rights, property and your future. The stupid - Anglos - still don't have a clue. LaRaza!!
screamingeagle
Mentor
Caption for Jorge Bush:
"Thank you, Master. Your will is my command."
"Thank you, Master. Your will is my command."
White Shogun
Hall of Famer
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2005
- Messages
- 6,285
The problem with organizing a counter-protest is that the Mexicans will not stand idly by while whites march up and down the streets. They will come out in force and use violence to stop the protest, and whites know this. Hence its going to be a lot harder to get white people to show up for such a protest, knowing that violence will likely result and that they are as likely, if not more so, to be arrested for disturbing the peace than the counter protesters.
Too civilized for our own good.
Too civilized for our own good.
White Shogun said:
We should take them on anyway. Even if we lost a fight because we were outnumbered, it would show there are those who still have enough guts to resist. That being said, I'm not going alone without an assault rifle and body armour.
screamingeagle
Mentor
The reason so many people are marching for immigration amnesty is that their employers pay them to do so. Students are given credit. The mexican consulates aslo pay organizers to get people out.
If anti-immigration people were paid to march or given credit at school, they would turn out in larger numbers than anything the Invaders could bring together...and they wouldn't leave as much litter. (After the La Marche on March 10th, the place looked like a pig stye
If anti-immigration people were paid to march or given credit at school, they would turn out in larger numbers than anything the Invaders could bring together...and they wouldn't leave as much litter. (After the La Marche on March 10th, the place looked like a pig stye
White Shogun
Hall of Famer
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2005
- Messages
- 6,285
A man was arrested in Tucson for burning a Mexican flag in a counter protest. You can burn the American flag in the good old US of A, but don't burn a MEXICAN FLAG.
Tuscon man arrested
Tuscon man arrested
Jimmy Chitwood
Hall of Famer
it appears the protests aren't working as planned: link
or read the article here:
------------------------------------------------------------ --------------------
INVASION USA
Protests backfire!
NWOby poll: National demonstrations by illegal aliens have negative impact
------------------------------------------------------------ --------------------
Posted: April 12, 2006
3:25 p.m. Eastern
Recent images of seas of illegal aliens marching in cities across the U.S. are having a far greater negative than positive impact on the foreigners' cause, according to a new poll.
A NWOby survey of nearly 8,000 people shows coast-to-coast protests against immigration proposals in Congress - particularly to make it a federal felony to be an illegal worker in the U.S. - have not persuaded a majority of likely American voters.
Asked whether the protests have made likely voters more or less sympathetic toward undocumented workers, 61 percent said they're less likely to be sympathetic to the plight of illegals as a result of the protests, while only 32 percent of respondents said they're now more sympathetic. Younger respondents to the poll were more likely to be sympathetic than were older participants. And while 56 percent of Democrats said the protests made them feel more sympathy for unlawful workers, just 6 percent of Republicans felt that way.
"The gap between what the American people believe ... and what these elites in Washington thinks is right, that continues to grow wider," said host Sean Hannity on his national radio program today. "Many Republican leaders are siding with the elites, they are not siding with the people that put them in office."
The survey also shows an overwhelming majority of Americans - nearly 4 out 5 - is doubtful President Bush and Congress will find a fair and effective solution to the immigration crisis. While 88 percent of Democrats and 85 percent of independents said it's unlikely a solution will be found, 66 percent of Republicans agreed.
Doubt about the prospect of Washington's success on the issue spreads across all geographic and racial demographics, the survey shows.
Asked specifically whether Bush or Congress is trusted more to properly handle the immigration issue, 50 percent said they don't think it's likely either branch of government will get the job done properly. Another 22 percent said they trust Congress more, while 17 percent said they think Bush is more likely to come up with the right answer. There was some difference depending on the age of the respondents - those over age 65 said they trusted Bush more, while those under age 30 said they put more trust in Congress.
Likely voters said their biggest concern about illegal immigration is the burden it places on government social services at all levels. While 27 percent said the increased burden was their top concern, another 22 percent said they hold a companion worry - that illegals will trigger an increase in the cost of government services.
One in four - 26 percent - said they were concerned America's southern border may be the entry point for terrorists intent on attacking the U.S.
A majority of Americans said they oppose amnesty for illegals who already reside in this nation. While 52 percent said there should be no amnesty, 32 percent said they'd favor it.
The survey shows significant partisan divide on this question. Among Democrats nationwide, 51 percent favor amnesty, while 29 percent oppose it and another 20 percent said they are unsure. Among Republicans, just 13 percent said they favor amnesty, while 76 percent said they oppose such an offer.
The NWOby Interactive survey included 7,967 respondents nationwide between March 31 and April 3, and has a margin of error of +/- 1.1 percentage points.
or read the article here:
------------------------------------------------------------ --------------------
INVASION USA
Protests backfire!
NWOby poll: National demonstrations by illegal aliens have negative impact
------------------------------------------------------------ --------------------
Posted: April 12, 2006
3:25 p.m. Eastern
Recent images of seas of illegal aliens marching in cities across the U.S. are having a far greater negative than positive impact on the foreigners' cause, according to a new poll.
A NWOby survey of nearly 8,000 people shows coast-to-coast protests against immigration proposals in Congress - particularly to make it a federal felony to be an illegal worker in the U.S. - have not persuaded a majority of likely American voters.
Asked whether the protests have made likely voters more or less sympathetic toward undocumented workers, 61 percent said they're less likely to be sympathetic to the plight of illegals as a result of the protests, while only 32 percent of respondents said they're now more sympathetic. Younger respondents to the poll were more likely to be sympathetic than were older participants. And while 56 percent of Democrats said the protests made them feel more sympathy for unlawful workers, just 6 percent of Republicans felt that way.
"The gap between what the American people believe ... and what these elites in Washington thinks is right, that continues to grow wider," said host Sean Hannity on his national radio program today. "Many Republican leaders are siding with the elites, they are not siding with the people that put them in office."
The survey also shows an overwhelming majority of Americans - nearly 4 out 5 - is doubtful President Bush and Congress will find a fair and effective solution to the immigration crisis. While 88 percent of Democrats and 85 percent of independents said it's unlikely a solution will be found, 66 percent of Republicans agreed.
Doubt about the prospect of Washington's success on the issue spreads across all geographic and racial demographics, the survey shows.
Asked specifically whether Bush or Congress is trusted more to properly handle the immigration issue, 50 percent said they don't think it's likely either branch of government will get the job done properly. Another 22 percent said they trust Congress more, while 17 percent said they think Bush is more likely to come up with the right answer. There was some difference depending on the age of the respondents - those over age 65 said they trusted Bush more, while those under age 30 said they put more trust in Congress.
Likely voters said their biggest concern about illegal immigration is the burden it places on government social services at all levels. While 27 percent said the increased burden was their top concern, another 22 percent said they hold a companion worry - that illegals will trigger an increase in the cost of government services.
One in four - 26 percent - said they were concerned America's southern border may be the entry point for terrorists intent on attacking the U.S.
A majority of Americans said they oppose amnesty for illegals who already reside in this nation. While 52 percent said there should be no amnesty, 32 percent said they'd favor it.
The survey shows significant partisan divide on this question. Among Democrats nationwide, 51 percent favor amnesty, while 29 percent oppose it and another 20 percent said they are unsure. Among Republicans, just 13 percent said they favor amnesty, while 76 percent said they oppose such an offer.
The NWOby Interactive survey included 7,967 respondents nationwide between March 31 and April 3, and has a margin of error of +/- 1.1 percentage points.
Jimmy Chitwood
Hall of Famer
the politically correct regime is pulling out all stop in order to stop people from discussing the border issue. Penn State Republican students planned a "Catch an Illegal Immigrant" Day. guess what happened next: link
'Catch immigrant' game raises an outcry at PSU
Friday, April 14, 2006
By Bill Schackner, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
The College Republicans at Penn State University wanted to enter the debate about the nation's borders by playing a "Catch an Illegal Immigrant Game."
People would be invited to "catch" group members wearing orange shirts symbolizing illegal aliens.
Amid the student outcry that ensued, they softened their plan to an illegal immigration awareness day in which leafleting and speech-making would let both sides air their views on immigration policies.
But that hasn't entirely erased the bad feeling over the campus event, now planned for Wednesday.
Yesterday, about 150 students and some faculty opposed to the idea rallied in the student union building. And the university itself joined the fray, urging the College Republicans to "re-think their approach as a step toward fostering civility on campus."
Penn State President Graham Spanier labeled the original idea "unproductive and offensive."
On any college campus, one person's crusade against intolerance is another person's bow to political correctness. Even as groups such as the Black Caucus and Latino Caucus registered passionate objections, others said they viewed the Republicans' plan -- the game included -- as a reasonable way to highlight concern about the nation's porous borders.
"You have to be creative to get students to listen to you," sophomore Chuck Knight wrote in a letter to the editor published recently in the student newspaper, The Daily Collegian. "For that matter, you have to be creative anytime you are trying to raise concern about something."
An official with the College Republicans seemed at a loss yesterday to understand the continuing outrage as he stood within earshot of speakers who decried his group as discriminatory and insensitive.
"They're against something that no longer exists," said Seth Bender, 20, chairman of the group and a sophomore from Lebanon. "I think they're just misinformed."
He said the controversy helped publicize the event. But he also said even some within his organization were uneasy with the original idea.
In recent days, the dispute over immigration and immigrant rights has turned out hundreds of thousands of protesters in cities across the nation. Such debate belongs on a university campus, said Penn State officials, and the Republicans' event as currently proposed, complete with a forum in which illegal immigration and the benefits of legal immigration are to be discussed, seems at least to be an attempt to do that.
"The Constitution allows College Republicans and other student groups to hold expressive events, even ones that may be deemed offensive by some," said Penn State spokesman Tysen Kendig.
Still, he said, there is lingering ill will that the event would be staged in any form. Some who registered complaints with the administration said they saw uncomfortable likenesses to the original game, down to participants designated to discuss illegal immigration wearing orange shirts.
Similar events staged by conservative students on other campuses, including the University of North Texas, have stirred emotions. And that was true at Penn State yesterday as protesters like alumnus Michael Benitez called the event unfit for his alma mater:
"If we're supposed to be a place that promotes diversity and social intelligence, why is this happening?"
(Wade Malcolm contributed to this report. Bill Schackner can be reached at bschackner@post-gazette.com or 412-263-1977. )
'Catch immigrant' game raises an outcry at PSU
Friday, April 14, 2006
By Bill Schackner, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
The College Republicans at Penn State University wanted to enter the debate about the nation's borders by playing a "Catch an Illegal Immigrant Game."
People would be invited to "catch" group members wearing orange shirts symbolizing illegal aliens.
Amid the student outcry that ensued, they softened their plan to an illegal immigration awareness day in which leafleting and speech-making would let both sides air their views on immigration policies.
But that hasn't entirely erased the bad feeling over the campus event, now planned for Wednesday.
Yesterday, about 150 students and some faculty opposed to the idea rallied in the student union building. And the university itself joined the fray, urging the College Republicans to "re-think their approach as a step toward fostering civility on campus."
Penn State President Graham Spanier labeled the original idea "unproductive and offensive."
On any college campus, one person's crusade against intolerance is another person's bow to political correctness. Even as groups such as the Black Caucus and Latino Caucus registered passionate objections, others said they viewed the Republicans' plan -- the game included -- as a reasonable way to highlight concern about the nation's porous borders.
"You have to be creative to get students to listen to you," sophomore Chuck Knight wrote in a letter to the editor published recently in the student newspaper, The Daily Collegian. "For that matter, you have to be creative anytime you are trying to raise concern about something."
An official with the College Republicans seemed at a loss yesterday to understand the continuing outrage as he stood within earshot of speakers who decried his group as discriminatory and insensitive.
"They're against something that no longer exists," said Seth Bender, 20, chairman of the group and a sophomore from Lebanon. "I think they're just misinformed."
He said the controversy helped publicize the event. But he also said even some within his organization were uneasy with the original idea.
In recent days, the dispute over immigration and immigrant rights has turned out hundreds of thousands of protesters in cities across the nation. Such debate belongs on a university campus, said Penn State officials, and the Republicans' event as currently proposed, complete with a forum in which illegal immigration and the benefits of legal immigration are to be discussed, seems at least to be an attempt to do that.
"The Constitution allows College Republicans and other student groups to hold expressive events, even ones that may be deemed offensive by some," said Penn State spokesman Tysen Kendig.
Still, he said, there is lingering ill will that the event would be staged in any form. Some who registered complaints with the administration said they saw uncomfortable likenesses to the original game, down to participants designated to discuss illegal immigration wearing orange shirts.
Similar events staged by conservative students on other campuses, including the University of North Texas, have stirred emotions. And that was true at Penn State yesterday as protesters like alumnus Michael Benitez called the event unfit for his alma mater:
"If we're supposed to be a place that promotes diversity and social intelligence, why is this happening?"
(Wade Malcolm contributed to this report. Bill Schackner can be reached at bschackner@post-gazette.com or 412-263-1977. )
Jimmy Chitwood
Hall of Famer
more news about our illegal alien problem...Mexicans to boycott US businesses on May 1, country expected to lose $37.00 in revenue. link
here are some excerpts:
"The Great American Boycott" is spreading south of the border, as activists call for Mexicans to boycott U.S. businesses on May 1.
The protest is timed to coincide with a May 1 boycott of work and shopping in the United States that also has been dubbed "A Day Without Immigrants." The boycott, which grew out of huge pro-migrant marches across the United States, is designed to pressure Congress to legalize millions of undocumented people.
Mexican unions, political and community groups, newspaper columnists and even some Mexican government offices have joined the call in recent days.
Roberto Vigil of the California-based immigrants rights group Hermandad Mexicana said his group has asked some of Mexico's largest labor unions to back the protest. Elias Bermudez, president of the Phoenix-based Immigrants Without Borders, is actively promoting the boycott in interviews with Mexican radio and television stations.
For some, the boycott is fueled not just by debate on the immigration bill, but by long-standing resentment over the perceived mistreatment of Mexicans in the United States.
"We want to show the power we have as Mexicans," said Carlos Chavez y Pacho, vice president of the chamber of commerce in Piedras Negras, across from Eagle Pass, Texas. Chavez y Pacho is also urging Mexicans not to shop in U.S. border cities on May 1, in part to protest what he calls arrogant behavior by U.S. customs officials and border officers.
here are some excerpts:
"The Great American Boycott" is spreading south of the border, as activists call for Mexicans to boycott U.S. businesses on May 1.
The protest is timed to coincide with a May 1 boycott of work and shopping in the United States that also has been dubbed "A Day Without Immigrants." The boycott, which grew out of huge pro-migrant marches across the United States, is designed to pressure Congress to legalize millions of undocumented people.
Mexican unions, political and community groups, newspaper columnists and even some Mexican government offices have joined the call in recent days.
Roberto Vigil of the California-based immigrants rights group Hermandad Mexicana said his group has asked some of Mexico's largest labor unions to back the protest. Elias Bermudez, president of the Phoenix-based Immigrants Without Borders, is actively promoting the boycott in interviews with Mexican radio and television stations.
For some, the boycott is fueled not just by debate on the immigration bill, but by long-standing resentment over the perceived mistreatment of Mexicans in the United States.
"We want to show the power we have as Mexicans," said Carlos Chavez y Pacho, vice president of the chamber of commerce in Piedras Negras, across from Eagle Pass, Texas. Chavez y Pacho is also urging Mexicans not to shop in U.S. border cities on May 1, in part to protest what he calls arrogant behavior by U.S. customs officials and border officers.
White Shogun
Hall of Famer
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2005
- Messages
- 6,285
I had heard of a counter protest being organized, a "Day Without Americans," in which all Americans would take a day off from work and boycott businesses. That sounds more damaging to the economy than a day without Mexicans.
Wasn't there a lame grade B movie made with that same name?
Wasn't there a lame grade B movie made with that same name?
White Shogun said:
Yes. It was called a Day Without a Mexican. It was about what California would be like if all of the Mexicans disappeared. Imagine if Whites all vanished. Chaos and anarchy would ensue. That would make for a better movie.