Whites Need Not Apply

Discussion in 'J. B. Cash's Column' started by administrator, May 7, 2006.

  1. administrator

    administrator Administrator

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2004
    Messages:
    60
    Whites Need Not Apply


    The 2006 NFL draft was another disappointment for those fans that believe capable white players should play at the professional level. Few white players were selected, about 24 percent, mostly in the later rounds so the vast majority will be cut without getting much of a chance. An additional anti-white surprise was the snubbing of Matt Leinhart one of the winningest and most polished QBs to come out of college since Peyton Manning. The teams that passed on this remarkable young man will come to regret it.


    The single most glaring example of anti-white bias was reserved for Mike Hass. Hass, a wide receiver for Oregon State, was selected as the 2005 Fred Biletnikoff Award winner. This award is given annually to the player considered the best receiver in the college game. Hass starred at Oregon State for the past three years and led the nation in receiving last year. He has proven himself as a topnotch receiver playing in one of the nation's most highly regarded conference, the PAC-10, against defensive backs that will play in the NFL.


    Had he been born with black skin he would have been one of the most highly sought after players in the draft, a potential number one pick. Unfortunately, due to his skin color he was selected 171st overall by New Orleans in the 6th round. His chances of playing, starting and starring are very slim.


    Some past Biletnikoff Award winners and their overall draft selections: Braylon Edwards (3), Larry Fitzgerald (3), Charles Rogers (2), Josh Reed (36), Antonio Bryant (63), Troy Edwards (13), Randy Moss (21), Marcus Harris (31), Terry Glenn (7), Bobby Engram (52). All of them first or second round picks. All of them multi-millionaires. All of them given immediate opportunity to start. And all of course black.


    This kind of racial disparity, were the races reversed, would result in lawsuits, civil rights protests, and all kinds of black anger that would be heartily supported by most whites. As it is, there is hardly a mention and nobody seems to notice or care.


    How does the NFL get away with this? There is virtually no organization in the country that can not be successfully sued for racial discrimination against anyone, even white males. The city of Chicago was successfully sued for discrimination by white fire fighters as was the police department of Baltimore. If those two government entities, both with little sympathy for white men, can be successfully sued for damages and ordered to alter their anti-white hiring policies then it is curious how the NFL escapes the clutches of greedy trial lawyers. Perhaps the problem exists not in the law but in the minds of the people.


    White athletes are caught between a rock and a hard place. The fan base approaches the race question as it relates to football in several ways. Most ignore it. The truth is too uncomfortable to acknowledge and when they are unavoidably confronted with it they go in to a state of denial or get angry. Those are the classic responses to situations one wishes to avoid because they know on some level they are responsible for the unfairness to white players and cannot bring themselves to admit it.


    Also a good percentage of white people feel that it is okay to discriminate against other whites. To many of them not only is it okay, they encourage it. It is one of the strangest ways of thinking in the history of mankind. It is similar to those lemmings that suddenly all decide en masse to run off a cliff and kill themselves.


    And many others simply unquestioningly accept the party line that blacks are vastly superior athletes to whites.


    There are many millions of white people that act as if they are guilty of a great sin and it is necessary for them to pay off the debt by punishing themselves, other white people, and even their own children. It is the racial equivalent of original sin, with no messiah expected to arrive and cleanse away the stain. Thus the white athlete can never expect any sympathy from these people. Whatever unfairness and bigotry is directed at them is perfectly fine because they deserve it for the plain fact of being born white.


    To the coaches and general managers that decide who gets drafted the issue is as follows. There are about 200 black football players each draft that are the best athletes available in the country. There are no whites playing anywhere in the country that rank with this group of blacks. It is up to the coaches to find them. They relish digging one of these specimens up that are hidden away in a Div. II school and not getting any publicity or attention.


    Look at the Olympics they will say. Who wins all of the sprints? And the long jump? No whites to be found there. Is any other proof needed? This thinking is ironic because football coaches talk a lot about speed but if straight line speed was really so important then every half decent sprinter would be aggressively recruited by football teams and the Pro Football Hall of Fame would be filled with them. What sprinter wouldn't trade the shaky life of a professional runner, who is dependent season to season on sometimes meager income from shoe contracts, for the big bucks contract and signing bonus of an NFL player?


    Of course the "speed" issue doesn't really matter. On those occasions when the white player has faster times than black players the focus then becomes something else. Loose hips, or quick twitch athleticism, or natural rhythm, or some such quality that makes blacks better athletes but cannot be quantified. There is no winning in this rigged game.


    Sure there are a few white players that rack up some good statistics. But it is only because the team they played for was not able to locate and recruit the better black athlete to fill the position. Throw in a few injuries to the available pool of blacks, factor in limited scholarships, grade or legal problems, maybe some racial politics, and voila! You have a Mike Hass, or a David Anderson, white players that the team HAS to play and sometimes they have standout careers, despite being woefully inferior because of their race.


    NFL coaches aren't fooled by statistics or production. They know talent when they see it, and talent has black skin. Hass? A fluke. Forget about him and move on to that Div. II black kid that should have had Hass's roster spot were it not for the injustice of modern day racism.


    Thus blacks benefit from the thinking that they are victims of racism and should receive preferential treatment AND they benefit from the racist idea that they are ALL better athletes due to some connection to the jungles of Africa.


    None of this could happen of course without the express permission of the white fan base. Many white fans like black players because they want their football players to be outrageous and scary. A white guy who looks like the kid next door or a buddy from work is not scary enough. It would be like having Cary Grant play Frankenstein. White players spoil the whole entertainment value of wanting to see primitive savages flailing away at each other.


    White fans also enjoy the celebrating and hot-dogging that black athletes do nearly every play. It is like watching a tribal war party. A bunch of wild out-of-control natives dancing and whooping it up. It just doesn't look real enough if you add white guys to the mix.


    So it really doesn't matter if the white player is as good or even better than the black player. White fans are the consumers of NFL and major college football. They want black players. Thus you have the "enlightened" beliefs of the modern day football fan and coach. The fans that have learned to hate themselves and place other people above their own and who enjoy watching the outrageous behavior of blacks.


    As long as these types of assumptions underlie the conditions upon which football players are selected then white players will always be shuttled to the back of the bus.


    Mike Hass pics:


    [​IMG]


    [​IMG]


    [​IMG]


    [​IMG]


    [​IMG]
     
  2. Poacher

    Poacher Mentor

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2005
    Messages:
    943
    Great article and great pictures of Hass. Look at the kid. He could be a poster boy for the NFL along with Brady, Favre, Manning, Palmer and Big Ben. But noooooo. What will be treated to instead? Endless pictures of Michael Vick, Donovan Mcnabb, Terrell Owens, etc, etc.... F'n joke.
     
  3. C Darwin

    C Darwin Mentor

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2006
    Messages:
    1,181
    Location:
    New York
    Awesome article! The strange thing is this question that I can't
    get out of my head: What would have been the story of Timmy
    Chang if he were black? He currently is a back-up for the Fire
    in NFL Europe.
     
  4. KG2422

    KG2422 Mentor

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2005
    Messages:
    987
    Location:
    Texas
    That is a good point Darwin. I'm sure he would have been a first round pick.
     
  5. celticwarrior77

    celticwarrior77 Newbie

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2006
    Messages:
    20
    It's shame whats happens to NFL am from the UK and there trying to black up soccer gone from 90% white to 75% in 7 years. I wish that NFL football was popular in Europe like basketball is if so us Europeans could give those blacks a beating like we've done in Basketball and then the coaches and scouts would the white lads a fairer chance but sadly I don't see anyway out other then starting some a league exclusively for whites but that won't happen. Am a big Patriots and whenever I visit Boston I try to go the game and one thing I've noticed is how colur blind the fans are in the UK if you fielded an all black team or nearly black team they'd get booed and the fans would be right on their backs but it seems the NFL are programmed from an early to accept this, thats so wrong.
     
  6. KG2422

    KG2422 Mentor

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2005
    Messages:
    987
    Location:
    Texas
    It's good to hear that it's not like it is here everywhere.
     
  7. docpoco

    docpoco Newbie

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2006
    Messages:
    8
    IM not trying to justify anything, because yuo know I believe the NFL is overtly racist, but Hass's time of 4.63 is pretty slow for an NFL reciever.

    In fact it was the 4th or 5th slowest time out of about 25 receivers.

    That hurt him substantially. Before that he was considered a 2nd or 3rd rounder.
     
  8. robcat

    robcat Guru

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2005
    Messages:
    239
    Location:
    Indiana
    Hass ran a 4.55 at his Pro Day workout. As has been discussed on this board, many of the most prolific receivers were not speed burners, including Jerry Rice, Cris Carter, Andre Reed, Art Monk, Steve Largent, Tim Brown, Rod Smith, Keenan McCardell, Jimmy Smith and others. They were superior receivers because they ran precise routes, had good hands, knew how to find and exploit the open spaces in an opponents defense, and most could run well after the catch and make big plays. Jerry Rice made many long, spectacular touchdowns with speed that most likely is slower than Hass. Hass's incredible productivity shows that he is a gifted receiver with all the talent needed to excel at every level of play including the NFL. Jerry Rices lack of speed did not prevent him from being drafted in the first round and he played for a small college program too. Theres only one reason behind the starkly different treatment that Hass and all other white receivers have gotten over the past 30 years.
     
  9. LabMan

    LabMan Mentor

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2006
    Messages:
    644
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    I am a distributor of The Nationalist Times,and I like to go and revisit folks that have read the paper for feed back.I am also a fan of J.B Cash,and of his solid,fearless writings!


    "Whites need not apply"ran in the NT,and when looking for feedback on this fine article,I Found just what I expected,our own selling us out! I'm sure all here are used to Whites working against their own interests,and this article again,convinced me from much feedback,that a lot of work remains to be done among our own.


    Can anyone at this site relate similar conversations and experiences?
     
  10. jaxvid

    jaxvid Hall of Famer

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2004
    Messages:
    7,247
    Location:
    Michigan
    Hey Labman, great job getting the Nationalist Times out there. Can you relate any of your feedback that you got? I have found "white nationalists" the worst ones on the caste system which shows how deep the brainwashing goes.
     
  11. LabMan

    LabMan Mentor

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2006
    Messages:
    644
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    jaxvid,Yes,I can share some interestingstories of your offerings,and The NationalistTimes also.I have neighbors whogo out of their way to avoid me because of my association with this fine patriotic newspaper,led by an editor who wants nothing but the best for our country and society,and backed up by writers who "tell the truth",J.B.Cash is among that group!I related to this editor thatseven White males in my area,to whom I had distributed the paper were told by their wives not to read same!!A mans first amendment rights destroyed by "the little lady"! I wanted to know more,so I asked the women first,please point out to me which articles are offensive to you,and do you feel that the truth is not being told.The most offensive were about race,No surprise there.But they felt that the articles were truthful.These women were offended "by the truth"!Next on to Dad,My question,If you feel that the paper has worth,and the writers are so intelligent,why would you let such a decision be made for you?Well mom was right along side,so nuff said!A female neighbor and I played golf and I gave her the copy of NT that ran the story"Whites need not apply"I ask for opinions on the paper when she was finished.She no longer speaks to me,and goes out of her way to avoid me!So as you can see,"the truth has her on the run"!We know that the current generation has been lied to and brainwashed for the last 30 to 40 years,but this woman is in her 50's!My next door female neighbor is in her 60's,and related to me that all of her sports heros were bi-racial.The sports involved being,baseball,golf,football.I asked why she did not choose heros from her own race,and after her eyes stopped spinning,she as much as said that the media made her decisions for her!nuff said again.She now avoids me also!How do I feel about being "shunned" in these situations? I feel that the Nationalist Times and staff are doing what they set out to do,and I praise them! And in a way,these neighbors identify themselves.There is much satisfaction in getting this paper out,and even more in getting feedback!
     
  12. jaxvid

    jaxvid Hall of Famer

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2004
    Messages:
    7,247
    Location:
    Michigan
    Yes. At a dinner party recently I happened to listen in on some of the conversations of the women. It was scary. We are the only society that allow women an important role in the decision making process. that explains our problems. Eons of evolution have proved that cultures survive best in male run societies. We are paying the price for not following that basic premise.
     
  13. LabMan

    LabMan Mentor

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2006
    Messages:
    644
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    The educational system in the U.S.,school boards,principals,teachers,etc as I'm sure you know,has been feminized to the highest degree.Just about all news stories now qoute a "spokeswoman",news anchors are almost all females.Again, many deracinated males that I know feel that this is real progress,instead of their displacement from society.


    The targets?,our grandchildren,who will grow up being told that the White Male amounts to zero in this society,and why would any woman want to marry one,and continue on with her family?


    Who injected this poison into our society?


    All who post here know!
     
  14. Guest

    Guest Guest

    Women respond to confidence and they have lost confidence in white men because we display too much sensitivity and indisiviness. If they want this they could become lesbians therefor permanently unhappy.
     
  15. Sark6354201

    Sark6354201 Guru

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2006
    Messages:
    255
    Location:
    Wisconsin
    I don't think generalizing women as a huge problem in such a way is fair. There are certainly some women (and men obviously...) that make poor decisions or who may be responsible for certain problems, but saying that women should not be allowed in decision making is insulting to all women in regards to their status as normal human beings.

    Don't any of you have girlfriends or wives that you care for?
     
  16. White Shogun

    White Shogun Hall of Famer

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2005
    Messages:
    6,285
    Maybe that's why they don't think women should be allowed to make decisions. They're speaking from experience. [​IMG] [​IMG]
     
  17. Bart

    Bart Hall of Famer

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2005
    Messages:
    4,329
    My wife, mother, sisters and a few sisters in -in law are very nice women. I respect and love them. However, some of them and especially my mother should be locked in a closet until the day after elections. Why? They will vote for any politician with a nice smile and lots of hair who talks sweetly about taxing us to death. They are social creatures who love big daddy government. Everything needs more funding. They are suckers for every sob story and con - man hustler.Whatever the glib politician wants he will get by simply adding these magic words at the end of each appeal. It's for the children! Then their eyes glaze over and they are off in lala land.Every single government social program and lefty scam is underfunded in their eyes.It would be MEAN to closeour borders to those poor people who only want to have better lives .And those poor kids in Africa with the flies walking over their faces, should all be welcomed here because we have so much and they are so deprived. These women have no clue about consequences and don't understand why Africa is what it is and why we will also become a third world disaster if we don't wake up soon. They don't understand the reality of race, genetics, intelligencequotientsand economics. If Oprah says it... it's Gospel.Edited by: Bart
     
  18. jaxvid

    jaxvid Hall of Famer

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2004
    Messages:
    7,247
    Location:
    Michigan
    As usual Bart you hit a homer. To Sark, yes I have women I care for which is exactly why I wish they did not vote. It is just as Bart put it. Yes there are men like that too but so many more women by percentage. You can draw a straight like to when this country went to hell and it would exactly match the amount of women voting in those elections.

    The only way I would want woman to vote is if I lived in a country that had a Constitution and a Bill of Rights, and a government that was elected by the people. Until then, no way.
     

Share This Page