Why is the magic number 30%

Discussion in 'NFL' started by Bear Backer, Sep 21, 2008.

  1. Bear Backer

    Bear Backer Mentor

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2007
    Messages:
    658
    Location:
    Illinois
    Why is it that right around 30% is the magic number in the NFL as far as whites are concerned? We all know the NFL has had this 30% template for a very long time with regards to white players as a percentage of the NFL, but why? That alone should be a clear indication of a caste system at work. The probability of this would just not seem to support this, given that blacks make up roughly 13 percent of the American population while whites are around 65% + depending on the definition. One would at least expect some substantial fluxuations over the years, but that is clearly not the case as far as I can tell.

    I did some further figuring and in 2008 the total white players on NFL rosters comes out to around 30.2 % out of 1699 players. (Please bear in mind that Math is not one my strongest fields, but I believe my calculations were fairly accurated given the haste in which I performed them.)

    White starters on the other hand make up around 26.4% of 704 players. If you took into consideration Kickers and Punters you come out with about 33% of white NFL Starters out of 768 players. (Even though special teams is not really a starting position) Here is where it becomes more interesting to me and speaks clearly of a caste system. Lets suppose legitimately that whites made up 30% of the 704 starting players on offense and defense in the NFL. If you also took into consideration punters and kickers, that would jump the percentage of white starters up to around 35% of 768 players. So it would seem to me that it might be obvious that white starting players in the NFL are being purposely kept below the magical 30% threshold of which number they are a total percentage of in the NFL. Perhaps, to make up for Kickers, Punters and other such positions like longsnappers. Though they are not starters per say, they are nevertheless, highly visible part of the game.

    I would be very interested to know how the percentages have correlated throughout this modern caste era of the NFL. This may seem out there, and maybe it is, because I am tired and it is late. I tend to ponder far out things at times like this when I can't sleep. That being said, what is so important about the magic number 30%? Why has the NFl seemingly gone to great lengths to reduce the white players in the league to this number and then strangely maintain it over the course of the modern era NFL caste system? Why 30%? What is so magical about that number? Has someone possibly done research that suggests that roughly 30% is a minimum for DWF's still maintaining interest in the sport and spending their hard earned dollars? Did the NBA come to a somewhat similar conclusion after the coal black thuggery era of the 90's and early 00's when fans began turning away from the league in droves? Now the NBA is around 25% white or so I have heard. That is not exactly 30%, but it very close. Close enough to make me wonder?
     
  2. dwid

    dwid Hall of Famer

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2008
    Messages:
    4,240
    Location:
    Louisiana
    I don't think it means anything, it would be 10% or less if they could make it that. If blacks would've taken over the quarterback position like they wanted instead of constantly failing at it, it would be even darker.
     
  3. foreverfree

    foreverfree Mentor

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2004
    Messages:
    901
    The Negroidization of the NFL must cause you your sleepless nights, BB, otherwise you wouldn't be attempting this research. [​IMG] Get some sleep. You can do this research better than I or most can.

    JohnEdited by: foreverfree
     
  4. Kaptain

    Kaptain Master

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2004
    Messages:
    3,147
    Location:
    Minnesota
    I think the more magical number that is sometimes tip-toed through but NEVER crossed is the 50% barrier on individual teams. Every once in awhile a team will approach having an 1/2 white roster (albeit counting kickers and punters), but never will a team cross the barrier. Even with totally random odds one team out of thirty would surely have an over 50% white team while the entire league lingers around 30%. Random mathematics I'm sure would bear this out. The fact that no single team ever does get over 50% illustrates the social engineering that goes on in the NFL.
     
  5. whiteathlete33

    whiteathlete33 Hall of Famer

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2007
    Messages:
    12,669
    Location:
    New Jersey
    The reason it is so difficult to get to 50 percent whites on a team is because of the lack of whites at certain position. The Packers are close to it because they have all whites on the offensive live and even a few white defensive players. There are just so few whites at DT, DE, CB, RB, WR, Safety, and linebacker that it makes it real difficult.
     
  6. Bear Backer

    Bear Backer Mentor

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2007
    Messages:
    658
    Location:
    Illinois
    That is a very good point.
     
  7. Bear Backer

    Bear Backer Mentor

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2007
    Messages:
    658
    Location:
    Illinois
    Not really, I have always been a chronic night person and insomniac. I guess I just don't require as much sleep as most people, because I can get 2-3 hours of sleep and function fine the next morning. In fact sometimes if I do sleep what most people would consider a normal 8 hour night, I feel in a fog when I wake up. I feel like I have been asleep for decades and am waking up behind the world.
     
  8. Don Wassall

    Don Wassall Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2004
    Messages:
    26,267
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    Take away the positions of place kicker, punter and long snapper and percentage is just 25% white. That's pretty damn black. If QB and the offensive line became as black as the other positions excluding TE, the NFL for all intents and purposes would be an all-black league.


    If the Caste System is ever exposed and defeated, white QBs holding the line as brilliantly as they have been for the past decademay be seen as the decisive turning point. But then again, the drunk white fans have been trained to think that quarterback is a "non-athletic" position except for whenan affleteis playing it.Edited by: Don Wassall
     
  9. PhillyBirds

    PhillyBirds Mentor

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2008
    Messages:
    975
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    I like that analogy. We're fighting a war here.
     
  10. Maple Leaf

    Maple Leaf Mentor

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2006
    Messages:
    883
    Location:
    Ontario
    This answers the question as to how the 30% is achieved. But, more importantly, what it does not answer is why.
     
  11. PhillyBirds

    PhillyBirds Mentor

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2008
    Messages:
    975
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    I think we know why. You're posting on it's website. [​IMG]
     
  12. Maple Leaf

    Maple Leaf Mentor

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2006
    Messages:
    883
    Location:
    Ontario
    What I mean Philly, is why the Caste system?
     
  13. Don Wassall

    Don Wassall Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2004
    Messages:
    26,267
    Location:
    Pennsylvania

    A surprising question from someone with over 500 posts. The whys have been discussed innumerable times on the board as well as covered in many articles. See J. B. Cash's piece on Cultural Marxism for one good example that sums it up well. In a nutshell, the Caste System is part of a larger agenda involving globalism, deracination, demographic revolution, psywar against whites, appeasing blacks, and other elements.
     
  14. white is right

    white is right Hall of Famer

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2006
    Messages:
    9,102
    Teams that have a higher percentage of white players also have less rigid thinking when it comes to racial slotting. It's not a coincidence that the Patriots saw a diamond in the rough in Heath Evans and fat ass Holmgren saw a guy who couldn't beat a more one dimensional guy in Strong or even stick on a god awful Dolphins team run by Massah Saban. Back when championship teams were at least half White they all used White players in the speed positions and had nearly all White O-lines and mixed D-lines.
     
  15. Maple Leaf

    Maple Leaf Mentor

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2006
    Messages:
    883
    Location:
    Ontario
    Don I know, I know your take on the question. It's just a question I ask from time to time to get other's opinions on why. Because I still cannot get it wrapped around my head that every time a white player that should be starting is prevented to because the coaches and managers have that kind of an agenda in their head. With so many teams and so many coaches and managers it is hard to believe everyone can be brought on board to attack their own kind that way. It seems to me that if they really wanted to attack whites like that there are better, more broadly viewed mediums than football which is now basically viewed by about 10% of the weekly TV audience. The owners are the ones that really pull the strings and what do they get out of sidelining a Hass, a Leonard, or a Tebow?
     
  16. jaxvid

    jaxvid Hall of Famer

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2004
    Messages:
    7,247
    Location:
    Michigan
    I think the 30-25% number is significant. Here's why.

    Social scientists know that when a minority population becomes more then one-third of the total population you have social unrest. Below one-third the minority is not powerful enough in numbers to enact any meaningful change that would benefit their group, once over that threshold the group then realizes it has significant enough clout to challange the majority.

    On a football team there is a lot of social interaction. The players live together for long stretches of time, that means sitting around talking, listening to the kind of music they like, personal interests, common friends and so on. Most white players in the NFL are not whiggers so they would be totally unable to fit in with the urban black player/groups.

    Teams also divide into position orientated groups, the QB's hang with each other, receivers and DB's run drills together, the offensive line works together etc.
    If there is one or two white guys in a black dominated position they are outsiders. They are not a member of the in-group and so their presence is a disruption to the cohesion of the unit. Coaches know this.

    Note how on NFL teams white players, who are the minority, are kept contained in similar groups. White QBs all by themselves, white offensive lineman hanging out talking about hunting, even the few ball handling postions whites are allowed to play: fullback and tight end, might as well be offensive lineman and usually spend alot of time with that group anyway.

    Any other white player at another position better be strong willed and a loaner (or maybe a mascot whigger) or they will have a very difficult time. Coaches will not even mess with the "chemistry" by bothering to put white guys in that position. They just don't recruit or draft them to play those positions so it never becomes a problem.

    The racial dynamics of the NFL was created by cultual marxism but is kept in place by human nature.
     
  17. Don Wassall

    Don Wassall Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2004
    Messages:
    26,267
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    Great post, Jaxvid. None of what goes on needs to be consciously discussed among coaches, owners, scouts, etc., just as announcers aren't required to read and follow a "Caste-Speaking Handbook" when they're hired. Anyone with average intelligence and average powers of observation can see what goes on and what the ground rules are.


    The Caste System is just another extension of Political Correctness, which is more accurately described as Cultural Marxism. Cultural Marxism doesnot allow any empathy toward whites as a group. Whites can only be identified racially in negative ways, while all other races and groups can only be identified in positive ways or as victims of white privilege and white racism. Whites don't even have the right to survival under Cultural Marxism;what isthat but slow genocide? So is the existence of the Caste System as one of the ways whites are being marginalized through demographic and psychological methods that difficult to understand?
     
  18. Bear Backer

    Bear Backer Mentor

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2007
    Messages:
    658
    Location:
    Illinois
    That is another good point, and one which was really close to the mode in which I was thinking the other night. I think the part about chemistry is probably very important as I have observed this somewhat myself competing in sports myself. White athletes would seem to get a double whammy because of this. They already have to deal with the NFL's social engineering and promotion of non white players as part of the liberal Marxist agenda on race in America. Then the NFL also has to keep its black majority happy by pampering them and not letting white boys make them look bad or disrupt the chemistry they have with their black brothers on the team.

    There was a strange example on the Bears a couple years ago where black Defensive Tackle Tommie Harris was for whatever reason not getting along with his black defensive line teammates and was considering quitting the NFL. They didn't come right out and say this. They instead played off of the angle that he was conflicted with his life because of his religion. Obviously though as was later discovered, what he was missing was fellowship with his teammates. On most NFL teams Harris would probably be considered the problem, however at the time, Harris was the hotshot up and comer who the organization was depending on building the defense around, and his defensive line teammates were marginal. The Bears brought in his friend from Oklahoma, Dusty Dvoracek, who is white but apparently relates to him better than the other blacks. That is not saying that Dusty didn't belong in the NFL, he has turned out to be a pretty solid player, but chemistry apparently played a big role in this decision. Anyone who has ever spent signifigant time around blacks who is not a wigger or a delussional liberal who has imaginary visions of the world being sing along coke commercials, pretty well knows this is an aberration instead of the norm. Normally a white thrown into the mix with entrenched black players does nothing but cause controversey.
     
  19. white is right

    white is right Hall of Famer

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2006
    Messages:
    9,102
    The last troll probably has that 70's Coke commercial on Youtube in an endless loop... [​IMG] [​IMG]
     
  20. jaxvid

    jaxvid Hall of Famer

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2004
    Messages:
    7,247
    Location:
    Michigan
    Blacks are brutal on lone white guys at a "black" position. I played on a mixed football team and the level of harrassment was over the top. And in football harrassment can be physical. Factor in the millions of dollars at stake and I'm sure it gets ugly.
     
  21. capt_quelch

    capt_quelch Newbie

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2005
    Messages:
    2
    Good question, (why the 30%?), I tend to agree with the poster who said they would make it nearly 100% if they could get away with it. Speaking as someone who was a huge NFL fan from about 1969 thru about 1990, I am very glad to have found this site and see that there are others who have become disenchanted with the NFL for this very reason. The NFL lost me sometime in the early '90's, but I was on the outs with it for about 7 years before that. I've begun discussions with my sons (all 3 of them play football) about this topic so that they are prepared to deal with it when/if they go on to play in college. I love college football, but it's getting tough to even root for my alma-mater (Alabama) for this same reason...when my sons and I watch the Tide every Saturday we find ourselves focusing mainly on the few white starters.
     
  22. foreverfree

    foreverfree Mentor

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2004
    Messages:
    901
    You mean the spot with the kid giving a limping Joe Greene his bottle of Coke in exchange for (in turns out) Greene's jersey?

    John
     
  23. foreverfree

    foreverfree Mentor

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2004
    Messages:
    901
    Or (I just got finished glancing over the whole thread [​IMG] ) do you speak of that spot at the very beginning of the '70s of all those people of various colors standing on a hill, Cokes in hand, teaching the world to sing? (I was about 8 years old when that spot ran)

    John
     
  24. white is right

    white is right Hall of Famer

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2006
    Messages:
    9,102
    The one where the American Indian, the Mestizo, the African, East Asian, Australoid and various Whites all sing together and try to end world hunger and aggression and all things evil..... [​IMG]
     
  25. Maple Leaf

    Maple Leaf Mentor

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2006
    Messages:
    883
    Location:
    Ontario
    I thought there was some kind of hidden agenda to the NFL's white/black script but I haven't seen much. There is no doubt that the culture of football has changed in the past thirty years. There is no doubt that socialist "Marxist" culture has permeated into football.

    Jaxvid, your point about keeping the league to 30% because it is a controllable number rings true. It has now become the norm and not challenged very much. But I dispute the original reason for that 30%. I think the NFL wanted a 70% black majority primarily to employ disorderly rabble that would not unite and work cohesively. A large group of intelligent, aggressive, media savy and organized whites became a pain in the ass to the owners. White players had to be kept in check. The '70s and early '80s were a tumultous time for labour relations in the NFL. The changes to the league's racial makeup became status quo and became the culture. Cultural Marxism has become a dominant shaping force in North America, and justifies what the owners have done, and gives the owners a reason to hide behind. But what evidence do we have to show that the owners took it upon themselves to be politcally correct and create some kind of psywar against whites by blackening the league? Are there letters of direction anywhere that came out of the head office or boardrooms? Are there taped or written minutes of meetings that prove the owners planned to deracinate whites by making them feel inferior because they could not play football? While those may be the affects they do not seem to hold up as the original reasons to keep whites out of the NFL.

    If society's social planners really wanted to influence white culture, why use football? Why not use Hollywood? Hollywood reaches nearly 90% of North America whereas the NFL reaches, and perhaps influences, 5% of it. If the goal of the social planning by the cultural marxists is to ruin white culture through sports then why is it that the NFL and NBA are the only black majority professional sports? And recently the NBA has been trying to do an image makeover and is trying to bring whites back into the game. All other professional team sports and almost all other professional individual sports have white majorities. So these cultural marxists -wherever they are- have a lot of "splaning" to do.

    I still think when it comes down to it the league's owners are following the 30% rule because for the moment it is a good business plan. Their workforce is majority zombie. They fill their stadiums for 16 weeks a year with the other zombies. The zombie customers buy anything and pay anything with the NFL logo on it. The TV networks pay the owners billions for the rights to broadcast to zombies. Sunday Night Zombie is the most watched sports program on televison. The NFL is the richest sports business on the planet. Valuations go up every year win or lose. The Washington Redskins are valued at over a billion and they love losing. Oh how they just love losing -on the field! For the moment it seems the sky is the limit for all of the NFL franchises even though interest in football is slowly waning. So why should the owners make any changes to a good thing for them? The owners already have the white customer so they do not need to go out to try and sell to them.


    Edited by: Maple Leaf
     

Share This Page