Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Boxing' started by a5308860, Oct 9, 2013.
That article is typical parroting written by the envious. The arguments made in it are as porous as a colander. Here are a few rebuttals, have fun that writer's nonsense, don't fret over it.
1) Black boxers didn't suddenly disappear, but white boxers from around the world, especially from the east, did suddenly come forward into professional boxing during the last ten years.
2) You know they're desperate when they continue to claim little 5'10" Joe Frazier would dominate the K brothers like an amateur vs. a pro.
3) We all tend to applaud and revere our own, or that which is most like us. Latinos cheer for Latinos and Africans cheer for Africans. But when people of European decent (aka "Whites") cheer for their like they are "racist", which implies they are unlike any other group.
In truth its the myth of black athletic superiority thats the real reason for the popularity of 95% of black boxers. If Joe Frazier was white he would be discredited. If Tyson was white he would be considered a bum for letting Buster Douglas KO him. Everything blacks do they get WAY too much credit for it. Whatever Whites do they get WAY less credit than they deserve.
Wow, our flaming :flame:troll poster dug up an old article from early 2012 to try to get our dander up. As Menelik is fond of posting: zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.
>White supremacy promotes Klitchko
>not even US Supremacists like Klitchko
There are articles everywhere that discredit white boxers. Are we really supposed to care about this article? Ok I read it....great, moving on.