Mexians lowlifes at Gold Cup final

jwhite96

Guru
Joined
Dec 11, 2004
Messages
206
Only in America: The Gold Cup final at the Rose Bowl had a crowd of 93,000 which was 95% law breaking illegal aliens Mexicans. They showed their total lack of class booing the US national anthem, and booing the US when they received their second place awards. The few Americans in the crowd were constantly harassed and struck by illegal aliens.

I attended a Gold Cup game 4 years ago and I can see why Americans would be afraid to attend these games. The incredible contempt the low life from Mexican show towards Americans shows how brain-washed whites are. Prior to 50 years ago, Mexicans who booed the American national anthem would have been physically assaulted by white man because there would not have never been a crowd at any sports event anywhere in US which had 95% of the spectators rooting against a team representing the USA. This was before the total demasculinization of the white man. Now these criminals piss on white Americans (and blacks as well). Both parties are in favor of allowing criminals who entered our country illegally to be rewarded for their law breaking. Republican "consultants" who really don't know anything always talk about getting more Hispanic votes by giving amnesty to illegal aliens. How stupid can people be? Hispanics overwhelmingly vote democrat.
 

frederic38

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jun 22, 2011
Messages
4,774
Location
france-grenoble
Last edited:

waterbed

Mentor
Joined
Apr 4, 2007
Messages
871
Location
Outside North America
In holland we have a great solution but it doesn't work when you have to players in for example gold cup but friendly matches we for example don't play against for at least 10 yeas against marocco.The last time after a goal of maroc in a friendly holland a lot of the 'dutch' maroccans runned on the pitch and acted like it wasd a war.So now is diced that we play against them when we really have too.So only european championship if these pigs qualify for it.I don't like to stereotype but at around 50% seems to have anti white sentiment.the people often say here on every three you have rotten appples.But I think on some applethrees you have more rotten apples maybe even the trunk is rotten.One of my favorite jokes I have heard was(in engels sounds not very funny) the 95% of them makes the others look bad.( instaed of small minority makes the others of tehm look bad) it is often used for maroccans in Holland.
smiley32.gif
 

Liverlips

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jun 3, 2007
Messages
4,197
Apparently Tim Howard was not too pleased either:

"Goalkeeper Tim Howard felt he and his teammates were disrespected by the way the post-game formalities were conducted by regional federation CONCACAF â€" one of soccer's most controversial governing bodies â€" and vented his ire as he prepared to step on to the team bus.

"CONCACAF should be ashamed of itself,"Â￾ Howard told Yahoo! Sports. "I think it was an [expletive] disgrace that the entire post-match ceremony was held in Spanish. You can bet your [expletive] if we were in Mexico City it wouldn't all be in English."Â￾

The final was held in front of a crowd of 93,420, the vast majority of whom were supporting Mexico. Howard, as opposition goalkeeper, was regularly taunted by foul-mouthed chants from the crowd as he took goal kicks from his own area, a custom in Mexican soccer."

http://sports.yahoo.com/soccer/news?slug=ro-rogers_tim_howard_angry_after_loss_062511

Good for him for speaking up but maybe he should have used his anger to stop some goals.
 

Highlander

Mentor
Joined
Nov 28, 2009
Messages
1,778
Does anyone know the B/W ratios of the U.S. team that started and ended this game? I would normally rely on Rebaljo to do this, but I doubt he watched this game, or even cared about it.
smiley2.gif


If there were more black than White starters or if they were about even, then I could really care less if "Team U.S.A" lost.

But obviously, that's only part of this story. Using the term "lowlifes" is perfect to describe these Mex(crements) (as Dixie would say
smiley2.gif
). They do, literally, piss on other spectators and into beer cups and then toss them onto opposing fans. Such class. It doesn't get anymore "lowlife" than that. Probably cheap-ass, disgusting, Tecate beer too. Good thing they banned glass bottles years ago. I wonder what they were calling Howard, and in what language?

As far as the post-game ceremonials being conducted entirely in Spanish, that should be another wake-up call to everyone. How utterly contemptible and disrespectful...although I like Howard's response to that B.S. (as if they'd only use English if it was held in Mexico.) They are now just putting it in our face and saying "what are you gonna do about it?"

So we have out-of-control black flash mobs everywhere out East as well as in Las Vegas in the West and lowlife, low-IQ, Mexcrements taking over the SouthWest and much of the rest of the country. The future looks pretty bleak. But I did see that Yahoo had a story earlier this week about the growing "White Supremacists" in the Northwest. Could it be that these are just regular White folk (not so-called "Supremacists") that just want to be left the f*ck alone and live amongst their own kind away from the obvious and brutal savagery that exists amongst these other two groups of people?

And, I agree...never before have the Republicans and Democrats been so similar to each other...the Democrats being the greater Cultural Marxist wh0res and the Republicans the greater Corporate, cheap-labor-loving wh0res, both sides resulting in the same ends. The Republicans here in the U.S. remind me more and more of the toothless and spineless "Conservative" party in Great Britain than of the BNP. They need more Pat Buchanan's but are getting more Jon Huntsman's instead.



Edited by: Highlander
 

Liverlips

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jun 3, 2007
Messages
4,197
Highlander - It was 8 whites and 3 blacks (including Howard who is a mulatto, or perhaps more likely, a quadroon).

Not a bad lineup and still a white team. However, I think the coach may be let go and that this will be the last U.S. squad we would want to cheer for.

The next Gold Cup will find me cheering for Canada most likely and I will certainly cheer for a Mexican team over the mostly black U.S. team that is likely coming.
 

Highlander

Mentor
Joined
Nov 28, 2009
Messages
1,778
Liverlips said:
Highlander - It was 8 whites and 3 blacks (including Howard who is a mulatto, or perhaps more likely, a quadroon).



Not a bad lineup and still a white team. However, I think the coach may be let go and that this will be the last U.S. squad we would want to cheer for.



The next Gold Cup will find me cheering for Canada most likely and I will certainly cheer for a Mexican team over the mostly black U.S. team that is likely coming.
Thanks, LL. 8/3 is about the lowest ratio that I could accept and still support and root for.

20-30 years ago, White youth started to play soccer more and more, because of the realization of many White parents, I believe, of the coming/existing Caste system in American football. But even in this sport, with the incredible number of excellent White soccer players throughout this nation now, the PTB at the top will simply not recognize nor accept this and demand a Caste team. So now White parents are putting their children in Lacrosse hoping for a fair shot there, and on and on it goes.
 

Borussia

Guru
Joined
Sep 29, 2008
Messages
231
Location
Florida
A very sobering match for US supporters. I've read online a few accounts by fans who were abused by mexican supporters and their over all venomous attitude to US injuries, national anthem, just everything and anything remotely US affiliated.

As for the match itself, demoralizing in most all phases. I can't sugar coat it: Mexico was clearly heads and shoulders superior in most all phases.
US back line was made to look like utter trash. Bornstein is getting most of the blame and frankly, rightfully so.
Howard has a solid reputation as a very capable keeper. He made many key saves in the England match at WC 2010.
He made no saves worth mentioning beyond just most typical scoops.
The last goal by Dos Santos will be replayed many times to make USA soccer look like complete amateurs. And objectively speaking, mexico's offensive onslaught did make the US team look foolish. Honestly, it took me back to the early 90s when the US national team was on par with such football nations like Luxembourg or Jamaica.

The 2-0 start and then watching Mexico dismantle the game piece by piece made it that much harder to stomach.
Tactically, Coach Bradley did not seem to alter anything after getting this (surprising) lead.
Honestly, Mexico was clearly the better team and looked to be in far superior cardio conditioning.
No one on the US team played well imho. Way too many give aways and defensively...wow, just Swiss cheese.
Dempsey has a bit too much Brazilian inspiration in him...falling down on some modest contact and looking around for the ref to call a foul.
I don't know where he picked this thing up? Fulham??

Many fans on other US soccer boards are not at all surprised at the scummy despicable behavior of the legions of mexican 'fans' - they displayed as much anti-American behavior as pro-Mexican. Then again, this is par for the course for many of them.

I really can't say I'm that surprised that the US lost to Mexico in the gold cup final. They have too many young and very skillful players...it is the cold hard reality right now.

Candidly, I was very impressed at their tenacity and technical skill in this match.
I think they tend to save their best performances for the US matches generally.
They hate us. It is what it is.
 

jwhite96

Guru
Joined
Dec 11, 2004
Messages
206
The fact white America has let Mexicans already have de facto control of California is especially disgusting since the low life population of Mexico has incredible hatred for the US. When the USA national team plays against Mexicrement in Mexico City, it's not much safer for Americans to be in Aztec Stadium than taking an evening stroll through the worst parts of LA. I saw a documentary which showed among other disgraceful things, all American fans had to sit in one small section (if they wanted to live )and required a contingent of Mexican Army troops to keep the savage Mexicans from assaulting the Americans. But when these same low life attend a game in OUR COUNTRY they can act exactly like the primitive beasts they are ,not only in California but in almost every city in the US. The only city in the US which the US Soccer Federation can be reasonably sure will have a majority of American spectators is Columbus, Ohio. The majority of the Mexcrement fans are illegal aliens which makes them criminals at large. Imagine any police department allowing a public gathering of 95,000 whites of whom 85% are criminals at large, and not bothering to arrest any of them.
 

Matra1

Mentor
Joined
Nov 27, 2005
Messages
527
Location
Outside North America
I was surprised when I heard the final was to be played in Southern California. I know they chose the location some time ago but no country gets to host these events often so when you do get them you are supposed to make it an advantage for your own side. A match in Southern California was alway going to be a Mexican home game. But then again there aren't that many places left in the US where a match against Mexico (and some other Central American countries) would have a pro-US crowd. Canada got so sick of this problem of the away team having more fans in Toronto during World Cup qualifying in the 90s they moved the national team's home matches to Edmonton where few immigrants live and sure enough Canada started getting some better results.
 

celticdb15

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jul 24, 2007
Messages
8,469
Matra1 said:
I was surprised when I heard the final was to be played in Southern California. I know they chose the location some time ago but no country gets to host these events often so when you do get them you are supposed to make it an advantage for your own side. A match in Southern California was alway going to be a Mexican home game. But then again there aren't that many places left in the US where a match against Mexico (and some other Central American countries) would have a pro-US crowd. Canada got so sick of this problem of the away team having more fans in Toronto during World Cup qualifying in the 90s they moved the national team's home matches to Edmonton where few immigrants live and sure enough Canada started getting some better results.
<div></div><div>An ESPN deportes reporter Jaimie Mottasaid that the only place in America that is usuallypro USA in our whole country is Columbus, Ohio.. Pretty sad</div>
 

Liverlips

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jun 3, 2007
Messages
4,197
"Thanks, LL. 8/3 is about the lowest ratio that I could accept and still support and root for."

Me too though if it is like 7 whites, 2 blacks and 2 Hispanics I might cheer for them unless they are playing a white or mostly white team.

Once they get to 4 (or probably more) blacks I will grab a Corona and a taco, get a tan and join the Mexicans in booing the "Americans."
 

Liverlips

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jun 3, 2007
Messages
4,197
By the way, looks like Freddie Adu - he of the cranium that is 3x too small for his body - will have a starting slot on the team from now on.

Wish he would play for his native Nigeria instead.
 

DixieDestroyer

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 19, 2007
Messages
9,464
Location
Dixieland
The untermenschen, mexcrement scourge need to flow back down to their 3rd world cesspool ("meckyco") like the brown turds they are.
 

nash99

Newbie
Joined
Apr 28, 2009
Messages
42
I wish the "media" would wake up to the point that nobody likes this sport in the USA except mexicans and other 3rd worlders that live here. How else do you explain a game played in the USA that is attended by 90% mexicans? What is really sad is that both these teams suck. The USA is awful and consists of mostly foreigners who can claim American citizenship. Mexico has never had any World Cup success even though it has a huge population of poor people and soccer is a poor man's sport. No one else plays the sport if they have any other options. It just like distance running.....dirt poor africans. Any soccer tournament played in the Americas that does not include Brazil or Argentina is a pathetic joke designed to brainwash American soccer dimwits into thinking the sport is popular...I've also notices that ESPU is hyping the women's world cup now...like anyone really cares about women's soccer? Bowling and card games make more sense
 

Westside

Hall of Famer
Joined
Sep 23, 2008
Messages
7,703
Location
So Cal
As Highlander stated we now have roaming criminal black mobs stealing and pildging and ingrate/ degenerate mexicans disrupting civil society. What are most Whites doing? Staying home scared to come out and enjoy the fruits of their tax dollars. We should take a que from those gays from South Beach to make politicians accountable for lawlessness , but I doubt it. Many Whites wl have to die first.
 

Liverlips

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jun 3, 2007
Messages
4,197
"The USA is awful and consists of mostly foreigners who can claim American citizenship."

Not true. The U.S. is a second or third tier power and often makes the final 16 in the World Cup.

This team was still mostly white and it is blacks - not Hispanics - who are being thrown onto rosters over more deserving white players.
 

nash99

Newbie
Joined
Apr 28, 2009
Messages
42
The USA stinks and most of their roster is players who grew up outside the USA. That is a fact. Ever heard of Freddie Adu......classic example...and there will be more of his kind believe me because THAT USA soccer. The World Cup is a one world politically correct charade. The USA gets to play Jamaica and Costa Rica to make the WC. If they had to qualify in Europe or Africa or South America they would NEVER make the tournament EVER. Final 16 means NOTHING...they are basically handed a free pass to make the tournament every year because FIFA loves American $$$$ and will do anything to get Americans to like soccer WHICH WE DON'T!!! Once in the tournament if we get a good draw and then tie a couple games we are in the Final 16...Whoopee....means absolutely nothing.
 

Matra1

Mentor
Joined
Nov 27, 2005
Messages
527
Location
Outside North America
nash99 said:
Mexico has never had any World Cup success even though it has a huge population of poor people and soccer is a poor man's sport. No one else plays the sport if they have any other options. It just like distance running.....dirt poor africans.

Not true. I'm from a European country where just about everybody - from working class to upper class - watches and plays it. It's an American myth that Europeans have no other options. The average European country has just as many professional sports as the US. In France for example rugby, cycling, tennis, and motorsports are as big as baseball and basketball are in the US. (Basketball is also quite popular in France and quite a few other European countries). In the UK there is competition from cricket, two rugby codes, F1, and other sports. In Sweden handball, tennis, and hockey are huge. Other rich countries like Japan and South Korea also like the sport.

nash99 said:
Any soccer tournament played in the Americas that does not include Brazil or Argentina is a pathetic joke designed to brainwash American soccer dimwits into thinking the sport is popular

The South American championships starts in about two weeks. It'll certainly be of higher quality than the Gold Cup with those two countries plus World Cup semi-finalists Uruguay taking part.Edited by: Matra1
 

Liverlips

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jun 3, 2007
Messages
4,197
"The USA gets to play Jamaica and Costa Rica to make the WC. If they had to qualify in Europe or Africa or South America."

Africa? The U.S. would win almost every African Cup. Africa sucks in soccer.

"The USA stinks and most of their roster is players who grew up outside the USA. That is a fact."

"Ever heard of Freddie Adu."

Unfortunately. He was one of 3 blacks starters but still most of the team was comprised of white Americans who grew up here.

"Final 16 means NOTHING."

Sure it does. And the U.S. is usually ranked in the top 20.

Again, not saying the U.S. is great in soccer but they certainly do not suck. They are generally on the same level as Mexico, Poland, Chile, etc.

Proof?
 

Liverlips

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jun 3, 2007
Messages
4,197
"The USA stinks and most of their roster is players who grew up outside the USA. That is a fact."

Not true. Most are white Americans who were born here.
 

foobar75

Master
Joined
Jul 29, 2008
Messages
2,332
They say a picture is worth a thousand words. Well, this is very symbolic of what's happening to this country:

23456299039200-26102928.jpg
 

Europe

Mentor
Joined
Oct 26, 2008
Messages
1,642
I heard Jason Smith on Espn say who cares that the post game cermonies were held in Spanish. Alexi Lalas doesn't care that Mexicans are taking over LA. He proudly speaks Spanish he said on Espn.

Most players are born in the US now but Feilhaber, Holden and Adu weren't.Many player's parents were immigrants so you can say these players don't go too far back. Onyewu's parents came to the US to study from Nigeria and of course stayed in the US because our govt is stupid and allows foreign students to stay. This guy plays for the US but also obtained Belgian citizenship. Altidore's parents are form Haiti and he wears a Haiti wrist band during games according to wiki. What has Haiti ever done for him? Agudelo's father is fromm Colombia.
 

frederic38

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jun 22, 2011
Messages
4,774
Location
france-grenoble
it is true that if USA was in the south american qualifiers, they wouldn't qualify
EVERY team in south america is dangerous
a while ago or example, bolivia beat argentina 5-0

it is also true that FIFA let USA qualify to the world cup because they want soccer to be more popular in the USA
it is the same with arab countries like qatar now, and asia too
the world cup is made in order to let a country from each continent attain the semi finals

but USA has good players, like donovan and dempsey
 
Top