Eric Holder Racist DOJ

[newguy]

On Fox News a couple of nights ago they had a deparment of justice ("DOJ") lawyer who had resigned, because the DOJ had decided to drop the voter intimidation case against the new black panthers. The case was a voter intimadation case in 2008, when a couple of black panthers were video taped holding sticks and had told one white voter "how does it feel to be ruled by a black man kracker". The reason the lawyer cited that the case was dropped was for political and racial reasons.

Those of us who are not as naive as the "average white person" knew what was going when they dropped the case about a year ago from the start.

However, now whith this whistleblower lawyer coming forward, the truth may be exposed. Of course so far the main stream media has not reported on this story. Even, if they do decide to report on the story, I am certain they will somehow make the whistleblower into the bad guy.

I myself am going to start making calls to my local tea party reps., to see if we can get some sort of national protest to march down to washington to the DOJ and call for the resignation of Eric Holder as a racist. I am hoping the tea party people are willing to take up this issue, for if they are not, in my opinion they are a useless organization and will lose my support.

 

[jcolec02]

Eric Holder has always seemed to be determined to undermine white people for as long as he has been in office.

 

[jcolec02]

He made some "controversial" comments about a year ago right after Obama took office, though I cannot recollect what he said...

 

[Kaptain]

He basically said white people can't be victims of hate crimes and won't be protected under hate crime or hate speech legislation.

 

[Kaptain]

Oh, he also wanted to file suit against Arizona and their anti-illegal law but admitted that he hadn't even read the bill.

 

[jaxvid]

The mainstream media has covered this case. It was in the Washington Post. The problem is white people don't care. If the sheeple aren't whipped into a frenzy by the jewish controlled media, then there won't be any reaction. And since the media don't care, there will be no repercussions. For example wouldn't this be a useful tool for republicans to use to get votes? Yes, of course, but they won't. That is the real shame.

 

[FootballDad]

The blue-blood Republicans that largely lead the party are hardly different from their Democrat opponents. They won't make a big deal out of this because they are afraid to be labeled as "racists", even if the perpetrators are the racists. Besides that, these blokes figure that as long as they're "nice" to the black folks, maybe they'll get some of their votes. Not much of a different mindset from how these elitists think of the border situation.

 

[DixieDestroyer]

More (big) FedGov meddling in state affairs...let by Globalist shill Holder.

US government sues Arizona over anti-immigration law

AFP

Tue Jul 6, 4:19 pm ET

WASHINGTON (AFP) â€" The US government on Tuesday filed a lawsuit against Arizona for a controversial immigration law which has been sharply criticized by America's neighbors and by the US administration.

A Justice Department statement said it was challenging the new state law in the courts because it hampered the authority of the administration of President Barack Obama to enforce national immigration policy.

It also placed significant "burdens" on federal agencies and law enforcement, the department argued.

Federal laws do not permit the development of a "patchwork of state and local immigration policies," it said.

"Setting immigration policy and enforcing immigration laws is a national responsibility," US Attorney General Eric Holder said in the statement.

Arizona, the Justice Department said, "crossed a constitutional line."

The Arizona law, due to take effect on July 29, makes it a crime to be in the state, which borders Mexico, without proper immigration papers and requires local police, who are not federal agents responsible for immigration matters, to determine if people are in the country legally.

US officials said they took the action after consulting with various law enforcement departments, chiefs of police, civil rights groups and other local officials.

Many said they were concerned the law would make victims of crimes or witnesses "less likely to contact or cooperate with law enforcement" if they did not possess proper legal papers.

Officials in Arizona argue they have been overrun by illegal immigrants leading to a spike in the crime rate and straining state resources. They say the measure was necessary only because of lax federal government enforcement of the southern US border.

"Arizonans are understandably frustrated with illegal immigration, and the federal government has a responsibility to comprehensively address those concerns," Holder said.

However, he added, "diverting federal resources away from dangerous aliens such as terrorism suspects and aliens with criminal records will impact the entire country's safety."

Meanwhile, Arizona's two US senators issued a joint statement slamming the lawsuit.

"The American people must wonder whether the Obama administration is really committed to securing the border when it sues a state that is simply trying to protect its people by enforcing immigration law," Republicans John McCain and Jon Kyl said in a joint statement.

More than 60 percent of the US population supports Arizona's new immigration law, according to a recent opinion survey.

About 30 percent of Arizona's population of 6.6 million are Hispanic, one third of whom are foreign born, including 460,000 illegal immigrants.

Department of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano said in the statement that her staff was "actively working with members of Congress from both parties to comprehensively reform our immigration system at the federal level because this challenge cannot be solved by a patchwork of inconsistent state laws, of which (Arizona's) is one."

Obama on July 1 renewed his called for Republicans to back immigration reform to bring 11 million illegal immigrants out of the shadows, but his political foes quickly accused him of "political pandering" four months ahead of key legislative elections.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20100706/pl_afp/usimmigrationpoliticsarizona_20100706202001

Edited by: DixieDestroyer

 

[DixieDestroyer]

Holder Floats Possibility of Racial Profiling Suit Against Arizona

Published July 11, 2010

| FoxNews.com

Attorney General Eric Holder speaks, Friday, June 11, 2010, at the Richard B. Russell Federal Courthouse in Atlanta. (AP)

Attorney General Eric Holder, just days after filing a federal lawsuit against Arizona's immigration law, on Sunday floated the possibility of filing another suit on racial profiling grounds.

The lawsuit filed Tuesday in U.S. District Court in Arizona claimed the state was infringing on federal immigration responsibilities and urged the judge to prevent the law from going into effect at the end of July. Despite some officials' claims that the law could lead to racial profiling, that concern was not cited as grounds for the suit.

However, Holder said on CBS' "Face the Nation" that the federal government
was leading with its "strongest" argument in the suit filed Tuesday and would not rule out a second suit months down the road -- if the law ends up going into effect.

"It doesn't mean that if the law for whatever reason happened to go into effect, that six months from now, a year from now, we might not look at the impact the law has had ... and see whether or not there has been that racial profiling impact," Holder said. "If that was the case, we would have the tools and we would bring suit on that basis."

Holder, reacting to the firestorm of criticism from Republicans and border-state lawmakers, said the Justice Department decided to file the suit because Arizona's immigration law is "inconsistent" with federal policy and the U.S. Constitution. He said there's nothing to stop local jurisdictions and states from helping the government enforce immigration law, but described Arizona's law as contradictory to what the federal government is trying to accomplish.

Related Links
Holder Casts Doubt on Death Penalty for Sept. 11 Suspects in Commissions
Tea Party Activists Push Philly Mayor to Renew City's Contract With Immigration on Arrest Records
Immigrant Advocates Protest Arizona Gov. Brewer at Boston Meeting

The law makes illegal immigration a state crime. It requires local law enforcement to question anyone they suspect of being an illegal immigrant on their immigration status -- provided they don't stop them for that reason alone.

Sen. Jon Kyl, R-Ariz., disputed Holder's characterization. Speaking on "Fox News Sunday," he said Arizona's law is trying to help, not hinder, the federal government's immigration efforts.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/07/11/holder-floats-possibility-racial-profiling-suit-arizona/

Edited by: DixieDestroyer