A Good Year for White Hoopsters

Don Wassall

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Sep 30, 2004
Messages
30,419
Location
Pennsylvania
J. B. Cash's latest column

A Good Year for White Hoopsters

84bae7ff79f6a431eaeb3a6780a6344d.jpg
pictured: J. J. Redick of Duke

(3/31/05) The NCAA basketball tournament, better known as March Madness, is underway and Americans have the rare pleasure of seeing white basketball players and teams playing great basketball. Since the NBA is almost totally dominated by black players it is easy to forget that yes there are American white men that play the game. This year's tournament features plenty of good white players, which is a good sign for the future since the college stars of today become the NBA players of tomorrow.

The racial caste system which discriminates against white players based on the propaganda myth that black players are always better jumpers, has effectively purged white players from the pro ranks. However in college the unique makeup of the student bodies from various schools ensures that there will be players and teams that proudly represent our people's rich heritage in the game of basketball.

The 64-team format of the NCAA tournament is one of the few cases where college athletics actually favors white players. Selection to the tournament is based on a school's won-loss record and spots are dedicated to many different conferences. This ensures that a wider range of teams are included. This method is far superior to the NCAA football bowl schedule which "seeds" the teams primarily based on the votes of either the sports media or the coaches, two groups of people most responsible for the caste system which discriminates against white athletes.

That's why the bowl season always features the first, second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth.....etc., etc. place teams from the SEC, Big 10, PAC 10, ACC, and Big 12 conferences, which always fill their rosters with as many black players as they can sneak past the academic admissions committee.

If reporters picked the college basketball tournament teams then you would have the first through eight teams from each major conference based on the "caste" theory that any squad full of black players is better then any team with more then one white player in the regular rotation. Thus teams like Gonzaga would be excluded so that teams like Florida or Miami could be included no matter what their record.

There were several very good teams made up almost entirely of white players that went quite far in the tournament. Two of the best players in the college game are white. Andrew Bogut of Utah was the key to his team's success. The 7-foot tall Australian was a dominating presence during games and is likely to be a high NBA draft pick, if not the number one overall pick.

Bogut is yet another example of how white basketball players have to come from another country to have a chance to succeed in the NBA. Dirk Nowitzki from Germany, Steve Nash from Canada, Zydrunas Ilgauskus from Lithuania, Peja Stojakovic from Yugoslavia, and Manu Ginobili from Argentina, are the best of the white players in the NBA. They are all examples of the racial dynamics that work against the white American basketball player from childhood to adulthood, through discrimination from youth coaches, college recruiters, pro scouts, and even the fans.

Ask yourself this: If a caste system does not exist for American players then why are almost all of the white NBA stars foreign? It makes no sense otherwise. It's ridiculous to explain in any other manner. The rest of the world does not produce superior white athletes to the U.S. as one can see from the Olympics, and their basketball is not considered better. What else can it be?

One of the best U.S. college basketball players, JJ Redick of perennial champ Duke, is an American born-player who has the great ball handling and shooting skills of former greats such as Pete Maravich and Jerry West. His pro chances will be limited though as he will no doubt be labeled a "poor athlete" no matter how fast he runs or how high he jumps.

The NCAA tournament is vastly more popular then the NBA playoffs because fans are seeing the kind of game the rest of the world sees. Passing, teamwork, solid shooting, all of the reasons basketball is so much fun to play and watch. The NBA on the other hand selects those few black college players that are used to taking all of the shots for their teams and then tries to mold a unit of ball-hogging superstars into a team. In college the coaches recruit players so that they can be pieces of a puzzle that fit together as a team. Hence the larger white presence.

Another factor contributing to the reduced success of white players in basketball is the racial bias exhibited by referees. Referees do not live and work in a vacuum. Consciously or unconsciously they understand that it is okay to penalize white players while it is not okay to officiate the same way with blacks. The message has been sent. If the Supreme Court of the United States is unable to muster the courage to decide issues in a race neutral manner what chance does a lowly basketball referee have? None!

They know there is little penalty in whistling white players for blocks, traveling, and other fouls since the press, the coaches and the fans are all in agreement that the white player is inferior and any penalty imposed against him must be deserved. Especially in crucial situations or when a white player makes a tremendous athletic play it is not unusual for a referee to call an undeserved foul. So much of basketball officiating is pure judgment of a split second nature that few question the mistakes, as frequent as they are. And who would complain? The pro-caste system media? The anti-white fans? The black players that benefit from the inequity? There is nobody but the lone voice of Caste Football and its supporters here to point out the obvious truth that goes completely unspoken.

White players are scarce in pro basketball because they are victims of unrelenting racial discrimination. One of the few reasons there are white teams and a few white star players in college is that there are only so many urban black players to go around. And some schools have such high academic standards that it is almost impossible to get a black kid from the city to attend their school. As the black population increases and academic standards diminish the day may come when the NCAA tournament will look like the NBA playoffs. Nearly all black players with a few token white ones. Caste Football will continue to fight against this unfair assault on the white athlete.


Edited by: Don Wassall
 

white lightning

Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 16, 2004
Messages
20,828
JB Cash nailed it again.Excellent article which points
out the truth in basketball.Why are their not more JJ
Reddicks.Most good white players are from else where
just like boxers,etc.Good job JB!Keep it up.
 

speedster

Mentor
Joined
Dec 9, 2004
Messages
704
The setup in college basketball is far superior to the one in college football,and the tourney is one of the best things going in all of sports.Briefly,the deal with teams getting into the NCAA tourney is like this,there are 31 conferences in Division 1 basketball and all but one of them,the Ivy league,have a conference tournament at the end of the season,the winners of these various tournaments go to the tourney and is known as the "automatic",so you will always have at least one team from every conference.The 34 remaining spots are decided by the NCAA selection comittee,who will use the dreaded RPI as the main measuring stick on who they decide will get in.Getting in this way is the "at large bid"and is always debated,partcularly by the smaller schools who figure theywere screwed over by the committee who will always favour the big conference schools.The system isn't perfect,but I favour it over football.
 

Colonel_Reb

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 9, 2005
Messages
13,987
Location
The Deep South
You did it again JB. Thanks for your hard work. Keep it up.
 
Top