Whitest College Teams-2010

[Colonel_Reb]

Of the 120 FBS teams, the following teams should start at least 11 Whites out of 22 full time positions during the 2010 season. The "close but no cigar" list shows teams that start 10 Whites out of 22. These numbers might fluctuate when the season starts. Thanks to Jack Lambert, whiteathlete33, celticdb15, Leonardfan, whiteCB, Deadlift, snow, and jaxvid for all the help this year!

Please give this info to White players you know or their family and friends so they can avoid teams that won't give them a fair chance!

1-BYU-17

2-Northwestern-16

3-Army-15


4-Air Force, Boston College, Colorado, Stanford-14

8-Cincinnati, Colorado State, Eastern Michigan, Navy, Washington State, Wyoming-13

14-Ball State, Fresno State, Northern Illinois, Ohio State, Rice, Wisconsin-12

20-Boise State, Central Michigan, Indiana, Iowa, Iowa State, Kansas, Miami of Ohio, Nebraska, Notre Dame, Oregon, Oregon State, Pittsburgh, Texas Christian, Tulane, Utah, Wake Forest, Washington-11

Teams with 10 White starters: Duke, East Carolina, Kent State, Maryland, Michigan State, Missouri, Ohio, Penn State, Purdue, Southern Methodist, Vanderbilt, Western Kentucky

 

[DixieDestroyer]

Go Eagles, Wildcats, Horn Frogs & 'Dores!

 

[referendum]

Great job once again on these updates Col Reb, Lambert, and Celtic. This year I'd like to be an updater for white starters. Toward the start of the season and during it I'll relook at some teams that might still be in flux and post updates. Last year I remember that Kentucky had major upheaval (mostly against white starters) in its lineup, and that Penn State and Michigan saw some white gains as the season progressed. Anyway, I'll periodically, time permitting, check up on the major conferences at least, as time goes along.

 

[Colonel_Reb]

Sounds good referendum! The more of us who do previews, the easier it makes completing them for everyone.

 

[Jimmy Chitwood]

in case anyone forgets why Caste Football is so important, this opinion piece by the Bleacher Report should demonstrate it yet again.

in the linked write-up, the author lists his 50 most likely freshmen to start this fall. unless i mis-counted, only 4 of the top 50 freshmen are White athletes: three o-linemen and a quarterback.so, obviously, there's no race-based preferential treatment going on. nope, it's a level playing field for everyone.

unless you're White, of course. then you're

 

[Jack Lambert]

Jimmy, that article disgusts me.

Anyway, I'm doing the number of whites by position for each team again this year. I'll start off with the Linebacker, a position which I believe is experiancing a white resurgence.

Out of 40 teams so far, 6 start 3 white LBs, 14 start 2 white LBs, 8 start 1, and 12 start 0.
Linebacker

3- Arizona, Army, Boston College, Fresno State, Penn State, Utah

2- Air Force, Cincinnati, East Carolina, Indiana, Iowa, Iowa State, Kansas, Nebraska, Northwestern, Ohio State, Stanford, TCU, Washington State, Wisconsin

1- Louisiana Tech, Miami(FL), Oklahoma, Oklahoma State, ULL, Utah State, USC, Vanderbilt

0- Arkansas, Central Florida, Clemson, Florida, Georgia, Georgia Tech, LSU, Ole Miss, Oregon State, South Florida, Syracuse, Tulane


Wide Reciever
Out of 40 teams, 2 start 2 WRs, 15 start 1 WR, and 22 start no white WRs.

2- Air Force, Washington State

1- Army, Boston College, Cincinnati, East Carolina, Fresno State, Iowa State, Louisiana Tech, Nebraska, Northwestern, Ohio State, Oklahoma State, Penn State, Stanford, Utah State, Vanderbilt

0- Arkansas, Central Florida, Clemson, Florida, Georgia, Georgia Tech, Iowa, Indiana, Kansas, LSU, Miami(FL), Oklahoma, Ole Miss, Oregon State, South Florida, Syracuse, TCU, Tulane, ULL, USC, Utah, WisconsinEdited by: Jack Lambert

 

[Liverlips]

14 seems a bit low for Air Force. I recall in 2007 or 2007 they had 18 white starters.

 

[Colonel_Reb]

14 seems a bit low for Air Force. I recall in 2007 or 2007 they had 18 white starters.

Liverlips, if you'll find the Air Force thread you'll see that they had
21 White starters in '07. I agree with you that 14 is low for them. Its a
shame, but I don't see any positive changes coming on the defense,
especially the secondary.

Updated original post.

 

[Jimmy Chitwood]

seemingly every demographic in the country has a voice looking out for their own kind, except for White people. that would be racissssssss, of course.
but, if you're polynesian, it's cool to be proud of your heritage. hell, you even have a website specifically for coaches to check out you and your fellows.

nope, there's no double standard at all. if you're good enough to play, that's all that matters.

 

[celticdb15]

We have a duplicated USF Bulls thread in the college football thread. Don, if you would, please remove either mine of WA33's thread! No need to get posters confused! Lol

 

[whiteathlete33]

Yep!! Colonel just brought it to my attention.

 

[Colonel_Reb]

Update bump.

Edited by: Colonel_Reb

 

[Jack Lambert]

I updated my post above with the new teams. I hope to have an O-Line breakdown up tommorow!

 

[Colonel_Reb]

Update bump.

 

[DixieDestroyer]

Go (not so) Black Knights/Cadets!

If not for (cultural marxist spawned) "affirmative action", all service academies would be 95-99% White male. The standards (academic, community, personal accomplishments) used to be much higher.

 

[Colonel_Reb]

Update bump.

 

[Jack Lambert]

Well, I looked up last year's thread and saw that we had 47 teams that start 10 or more whites. Can we get there with 47 teams left? We currently have 34 teams that start 10 or more right now.

 

[whiteathlete33]

Well, I looked up last year's thread and saw that we had 47 teams that start 10 or more whites. Can we get there with 47 teams left? We currently have 34 teams that start 10 or more right now.

I don't know Jack. The issue is that we have quite a few SEC teams to still preview so we will see.

 

[Colonel_Reb]

I'm doubting we equal or surpass last year's numbers. We might, but I'd be surprised. Early on in the previews I noticed they seemed darker than last year. We'll be probably be very close though.

 

[Jack Lambert]

Yeah, I also think we won't get there, but we still have a lot of MAC teams left to do, a few Big 10 teams, and I've been researching Mizzou and K-State, and they look like they'll both be really close to 10 or over.

It doesn't help with teams like Oregon State and San Diego State employing more Polys and Blacks.Edited by: Jack Lambert

 

[Colonel_Reb]

Update bump.

 

[DixieDestroyer]

Go Falcons, Eagles, Buffs & Wildcats!

 

[ToughJ.Riggins]

I think we may be seeing FBS football get even blacker in the coming years with the anti-white athlete genocidal Nazi recruiting services having so much power. The Luginbill run ESPN Scouts INC., BrownieScout.com and WhiteRivals are so blatantly biased that the DWFs really have pea sized brains to not question the "establishment" here. Walter Football can mock white athletes while bringing up race, but any positive argument for white athletes against the United Negro College Fund Sporting Services...ehhr, I mean recruiting services will get you banned from Footballsblackfuture.com and other true hater websites.

ESPN put out a list of 7 of the top 9 QBs being black. This is around 80% of the top QBs black in a 13% black/ 75% white country.

WhiteRivals, BrownieScout and ESPN Luginbill INC. continue to put out lists of the top 100 WRs and RBs with only about 1 white on each list. It is so outrageous...Wake up DWFs!

 

[Jack Lambert]

Tough, I think we might've gotten a bonus prize this year. I saw on Scout that Jaxon Shipley, Tanner McEvoy, and David Glidden are ranked in the top 100 WRs.

Just missing out on the "Top 100" WRs, according to scout, is Cam McDaniel, who is ranked 102.

I'm sure Browniescout "analysts" wet themselves with fright when they saw they had mistakenly put three white WRs in the top 100 WRs.

 

[Colonel_Reb]