Pavlik endorse Hillary RODHAM Clinton

Discussion in 'Happy Hour' started by aussieaussie31, Mar 4, 2008.

  1. aussieaussie31

    aussieaussie31 Guru

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2007
    Messages:
    404
    Location:
    Outside North America
    http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/election2008/2008-03-0 3-clinton_N.htm

    http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/ny-usdems0303,0,7048 53.story

    Not sure if this is really news. I just thought there may be alot of interesting dynamics at work. I watched the Hillary RODHAM speach as well after Kelly the Ghost introduced her. Hillary went on about how Kelly got back up to knockout his opponent. In a nutshell I found it odd that she was using a example of a white man knocking out a black man while referencing her campaign. No doubt she realizes that she needs that white male blue collar democrat to vote for her. Edited by: aussieaussie31
     
  2. mrjohnnynofear

    mrjohnnynofear Guru

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2007
    Messages:
    330
    Location:
    Missouri
    She seems like she was defintely going with the white blue collar male. But I think with Kelly, he is a fresh story who identifies with most of the people in Ohio and vice-versa. May get knocked down but will be on top in the end. Although Texas will probably make Ohio a mute point, it is nice to have the blue collars workers have a say on who wins this state and election.
     
  3. Liverlips

    Liverlips Hall of Famer

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2007
    Messages:
    4,194
    At least he didn't endorse Obama!

    Clinton would discriminate against Kelly and his family with affirmative action and she pushes the usual hate crime double standard.

    But so do McCain and Obama so no real choice here for us rightless whites.

    Partly our fault for voting for whoever the GOP gives us each and every year. The more of us who vote Constitution Party the better.
     
  4. Guest

    Guest Guest

    When I saw this on TV I must say I was kind of bewildered why Kelly would support Hillory or any democrat for that matter. I guess Kelly is not learned on the Deomocratic Party. He doesn't know any better. Listen, like I have said, the Democrats are a weapon against whites and a tool for the minorities/blks.

    People in Ohio have to innovate and create better products to compete with Canada and Mexico. The government also, can not give US companies tax breaks who manufacter/employ outside of the country.

    And out of three, McCain is so much better. Don't be complicatent, vote for him. If you vote for the Demos or stay home the esmasculation of you is almost complete!
     
  5. white is right

    white is right Hall of Famer

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2006
    Messages:
    9,016
    Pavlik is probably a pro labour guy. His father worked in a steel mill. This whole election is weird to me. The black/mulatto yuppy gets the BMW crowd to vote for him and the snooty above the working man candidate is now a street fighter. I love her winning speech in Ohio where she basically gave the description of Pavlik's win over Taylor..... [​IMG]Edited by: white is right
     
  6. jaxvid

    jaxvid Hall of Famer

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2004
    Messages:
    7,247
    Location:
    Michigan
    I'm kind of bewildered why anyone sees any difference between the two parties? I think Hillary might be the more conservative of the three. What would it take the Republican party to do to turn you away? McCain is the worst. The only good thing is, he'll probably lose and teach them a lesson. If he gets elected it just sends the message that the feelings of the party members can be ignored without consequence. What will the Dems do that's worse then McCain? More dumb wars? More immigration? More affirmative action? They can't be any worse.
     
  7. Guest

    Guest Guest

    Jaxvid,here are the two reasons why BO and Hillory are worse. 1st, McCain wants to win the war and hopefully estblish a stable Muslim gov't like Turkey. A gov't that would be a ally to us and not let terrorist take over and use that oil to fianance further terror against us or our interest. Both BOZO and Hillory, her thighness wants to pull out our troops out immediately and let that region go to hell, not to mention ruining our reputation of being losers to terrorist.

    Second, Bozo and Mrs Rod will reach into your pockets further to fund thier socialist programs. For these reasons alone McCain is better and there is a difference.And Hillory based on her past and her current campaign is not and I repeat not more conservative than McCain. I would like to see your reasoning on this.
     
  8. jaxvid

    jaxvid Hall of Famer

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2004
    Messages:
    7,247
    Location:
    Michigan
    I'm not sure that establishing a stble govt there is possible, and at what cost to us? But anyway there is no reason to think that a Dem president would pull troops out right away, look at the inaction of the dem congress that was supposedly elected to do the same thing. Once in office they would revert to "war-president" mode immediately.

    I can't think of one way that a Dem president will reach into my pockets worse then McCain. He is a big spending liberal politician and once in office will show the same lack of fiscal restraint as Bush.

    Hillary has run to the left, so she will move to the right once elected, just like her hubby. McCain is running to the right and will rush back to the left once safely in office.

    I despise McCain and would not vote for him for dog-catcher let alone president. But it doesn't make any difference, whoever gets the job is going to be bad.
     

Share This Page