Hawk vs. Davis

white tornado

Mentor
Joined
Oct 5, 2005
Messages
617
Hawk vs. Davis: Did Packers or 49ers come out ahead in draft?

By Pete Dougherty
pdougher@greenbaypressgazette.com

One game or even one season won't prove whether Ted Thompson made the right choice when the Green Bay Packers' general manager selected linebacker A.J. Hawk instead of tight end Vernon Davis with the fifth overall pick in this year's draft.


Nevertheless, the Packers' game against the 49ers on Sunday will provide a first-hand look at the two late in their rookie seasons â€â€￾ the 49ers selected Davis at No. 6.


Thompson's decision to draft Hawk instead of Davis wasn't easy. Davis was an unusually gifted tight-end prospect, bigger and more explosive than Kellen Winslow Jr., the sixth overall pick in 2004, though not as polished a receiver.


The Packers could have used a big-play talent on offense, and Davis was the best prospect for that on the board. He also was the hit of the NFL scouting combine, with the best testing performance ever by a tight end.


"He was such a freakish offensive weapon, and nobody had ever seen anything like him at the combine," said John Schneider, the Packers' personnel analyst to the general manager. "So, it was a tough decision, because he seemed like a guy that was kind of a game-changer."


Thompson, though, opted for Hawk, who didn't show Davis-type athleticismbut was a complete package of standout talent, game-day production and off-the-charts football character. The Packers viewed him as a player they could build their defense around in the coming years.


"He was such a reliable (spectacular) guy at a big-time program and such a passionate football person," Schneider said.


"That's what edged out the other guy."


Davis hasn't had much of a chance to be a game-changer as a rookie because he missed six games with a broken fibula. He's been back for three games, and last week was his first at full strength since getting hurt.


Davis has caught only seven passes for an average of 9.9 yards a catch, including a 31-yard touchdown in his first touch of the season, against Arizona.


But what made him especially intriguing is that even though he plays tight end, where only a handful of players in the league are true playmakers, he has unusual physical gifts.


At the scouting combine, he blew away teams by measuring in at 6-foot-3½ and 254 pounds, and performing like an elite receiver in the 40-yard dash (4.39 seconds) and vertical jump (42 inches), and also bench pressing 225 pounds like an offensive lineman (33 repetitions).


Hawk, at 6-1, 248 pounds, tested well (4.42 seconds and 4.48 seconds in the 40 and a 40-inch vertical jump at his campus workout), though he doesn't have Davis' freakish combination of size and speed But Hawk scored off the charts in his love for the game and work ethic.


Once both Hawk and Davis were available at No. 5, the rebuilding 49ers were content to sit back and take whichever one the Packers' didn't. Scot McCloughan, the 49ers' vice president of personnel, said Davis' ceiling is extraordinary if he reaches his potential, but Hawk is a sure bet to reach his potential.


"The thing with A.J., you know exactly what you're getting," McCloughan said, "and it's going to be good. Worst-case scenario, he's a good football player; best-case scenario, he's a perennial All-Pro. He's going to be good no matter what because of the way he's wired and the physical skills he has.


"Vernon is a little more of a work in progress because he's still young enough where he's still trying to learn how to play the position. In college they said, 'Just run, we're going to find a way to get the ball to you, you're our best player.' In the NFL, you've got to be precise on your routes."


Almost inevitably, Hawk and Davis will be matched against each other on Sunday, both in pass coverage and run blocking. The two know each other in passing â€â€￾ they were at the scouting combine at the same time, and they both promote Under Armour athletic apparel.


Hawk leads the Packers in tackles (126) and has 3½ sacks as an every-down player. He's had occasional problems in pass coverage, though, where rookies have to adjust to defending the more complex NFL passing games.


If nothing else, it will be interesting to see how Hawk and Davis do if and when they're matched in pass coverage.


"(Davis) is a guy who can run. He's fast," Hawk said. "That's why we usually have some help in different areas of the field. We'll see. I'm up for the challenge."




How can Hawk possible be in Davis's leage I mean he run's three hundreaths of a second slower in the forty.
To recape Davis freak, Hawk reliable.
Edited by: white tornado
 

Bart

Hall of Famer
Joined
Feb 6, 2005
Messages
4,329
white tornado said:



At the scouting combine, he blew away teams by measuring in at 6-foot-3½ and 254 pounds, and performing like an elite receiver in the 40-yard dash (4.39 seconds) and vertical jump (42 inches), and also bench pressing 225 pounds like an offensive lineman (33 repetitions).


Hawk, at 6-1, 248 pounds, tested well (4.42 seconds and 4.48 seconds in the 40 and a 40-inch vertical jump at his campus workout), ]though he doesn't have Davis' freakish combination of size and speed. But Hawk scored off the charts in his love for the game and work ethic.





Excellent post! This is so illustrative of the idiotic mindset of writers. Hawk and Davis are very close in measureables. Both performing extremely well,but the description of Davis is that he blew away teams. Hawk on the other hand---tested well. Davis has a freakish combo of size and speed, but Hawk has a hell of a work ethic! Drives me nuts.
 

jaxvid

Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 15, 2004
Messages
7,247
Location
Michigan
Bart, you are so right, I caught the same thing, I had to read it over. Davis has 2 inches, 6 pounds, .03 seconds and 2 inches (which is the same as he is taller) over Hawk. It is virtually nothing, NOTHING....it is so blatent to see it in black and white and know that people will read it and never question the assumptions. Drives me nuts too.
 

White Shogun

Hall of Famer
Joined
Mar 2, 2005
Messages
6,285
I noticed they didn't mention Hawks reps on the bench with the 225. Anybody know how many he pushed?

It's amazing how many guys seem to show up at the combine every year who are so freakishly amazing that no one has ever seen anything like them before. There are always a couple. Isn't that an oxymoron- athletes like none you've ever seen before showing up at the combine every year?
 

White Shogun

Hall of Famer
Joined
Mar 2, 2005
Messages
6,285
NFL.com reports Hawk pressed 225 twenty-four times.

Although not a topic of this thread, just wanted to share that Mike Kudla bench pressed 225 forty-five times, tying a combine record.

Dayum.
smiley32.gif
 

PitBull

Guru
Joined
Oct 20, 2006
Messages
448
Did you notice what a big deal the writer made of the stats, as if that told
the whole story about how good these tests are and how predictive they
are? Hawk was a monster player in college and he's doing well in the
pros. CAN HE PLAY? Get him on the field. Let's find out. Who really
cares how many times you can bench press 225 lbs? Can you tackle?
Can you read offenses? Can you plug a hole? Are you fast enough to
cover a TE or RB out of the backfield? Lets say Dick Butkus could only
bench press 225 lbs 18 times. So what? Would you want him out on the
field? Hell yes! This stuff is carried to the point of ridiculousness.

All these tests are is a way for the people dishing out millions of dollars
of contract money to cover their ass by saying they hired the best
athletes, and therefore, the best players. But that is certainly not true in
many cases. Just look at the plethora of great players who were winners
and great competitiors, who could play with anyone, who were not
Combine freaks. A great athlete is not necessarily a great player. Who
cares how fast you run if you don't catch the ball? Do you block? What
about your attitude? Your work ethic? Even in saying that, Hawk was
excellent on those tests, on the field, and a great athlete in his own right.
Vernon Davis, however, needs a little work (and an excuse!). What a rat
that guy is! Three hundreths of a second is nothing-a bad bit of turf,
maybe!

Hawk will do well for a long time to come, as long as he is healthy. We'll
see at season's end who the better pick was. I'm betting on A.J. Great
find, White Tornado!
 

Bart

Hall of Famer
Joined
Feb 6, 2005
Messages
4,329
PitBull said:
Lets say Dick Butkus could only
bench press 225 lbs 18 times. So what? Would you want him out on the
field? Hell yes! This stuff is carried to the point of ridiculousness.


I remember Tom Snyder interviewingDick Butkus. He said in his day players didn't lift weights as much as they do now. The most Butkus benched was 160lbs. He still punished players on the field.
 

white tornado

Mentor
Joined
Oct 5, 2005
Messages
617
Its clear the guy who wrote this wishes the Packers had drafted Davis. What he did not mention was Hawk was quicker in all the agility drills. What's sad is the average sports fan will fall for this article and think Davis is a far superior athlete to Hawk.
 

Alpha Male

Mentor
Joined
May 22, 2005
Messages
775
Location
California
He also neglected to mention that Hawk had more reps than Davis in the becnh press. He uses DAvis impresseive number in bench repetitions as further proof that he is the better athlete without actually comparing that number to Hawk's. It's so slanted, but the acerage fan will buy into it.
 

White Shogun

Hall of Famer
Joined
Mar 2, 2005
Messages
6,285
Alpha Male said:
He also neglected to mention that Hawk had more reps than Davis in the becnh press. He uses DAvis impresseive number in bench repetitions as further proof that he is the better athlete without actually comparing that number to Hawk's. It's so slanted, but the acerage fan will buy into it.

Uhm... Davis repped 225 thirty-three (33) times, Hawk repped it for twenty-four (24). Davis got nine more reps than Hawk. At least according to the article on NFL.com that I quoted in my post.
 

Alpha Male

Mentor
Joined
May 22, 2005
Messages
775
Location
California
I stand corrected. Overall their stats are similar, but Hawk's greatest measureable is his "love for the game." LOLEdited by: Alpha Male
 

whiteCB

Master
Joined
Apr 14, 2005
Messages
2,282
Alpha Male said:
He also neglected to mention that Hawk had more reps than Davis in the becnh press. He uses DAvis impresseive number in bench repetitions as further proof that he is the better athlete without actually comparing that number to Hawk's. It's so slanted, but the acerage fan will buy into it.

That's becuase the average fan thinks "inside the box" and not "outside the box". They assume, and wrongly I might add, that the media does not have an agenda, the media reports fairly(when it comes to sports), and that the media knows what they're talking about. An astute reader would readily point out all the fallacies that are in this "story" or joke of a story if you want the truth.
 
Top