Fastest White Man (Charlie's Space)

Discussion in 'Track & Field' started by white lightning, Oct 13, 2008.

  1. greyghost

    greyghost Mentor

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2008
    Messages:
    632
    charlie is a chancer, dont let him annoy you guys, all he is looking for is reaction. if only he actually knew something hhmm! s'pose god loves a try'eror was that st. peter. anyway get lost charlie until you have something worth saying thats not racist, or derogatory to any logical person [​IMG] , you do more to actually harm minorities then give them any real standing [​IMG]
     
  2. mastermulti

    mastermulti Mentor

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2006
    Messages:
    1,580
    Location:
    Sydney Australia
    Charlie HAS commented,and positively.
    sheesh, give the guy a chance to get on line guys!

    I have found him to be a man willing to talk sense even if we did not always agree.
    His big mistake was drawing an arbitrary line at 10.000 seconds and saying no white has ever got there and therefore CAN'T.
    That was setting himself up for a fall , but we agree on more things than not.
     
  3. ToughJ.Riggins

    ToughJ.Riggins Hall of Famer

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2006
    Messages:
    5,063
    Location:
    Ontario Canada
    Maybe he thought Woronin's 10 flat was the perfect race, by the perfect white sprinter, on a fast track with all ideal conditions. Records are meant to be broken though. I hope Charlie stops by to discuss this with us. He seems like a nice fellow, although many on this forum disagree with some of his theories on sprinting. I do like that Charlie admitted that he thinks whites may make the best football players. Charlie I ask what you think about American football players? I think Charlie believes in the caste system being present in America to some extent, but he also engages in some of that typical naysayer attitude and negative stereotyping of white athletes. What say you Charlie?
     
  4. mastermulti

    mastermulti Mentor

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2006
    Messages:
    1,580
    Location:
    Sydney Australia
    well ToughJ, he's getting old like me and we've been waiting since seeing James Ray Hines in '68. It began to seem like there was a curse pronounced against it ever happening.
    I never thought it wise to draw an abitrary 10.000 limit, as if 10.0001 might happen but not 9.999. But he did and that's where he went wrong. I'd love to talk stuff with him for hours though I think.

    I must add though, that the media talk as if it's been happening since 1968,but the truth is sub10 didn't become commonplace in even international competitions till late 80s really, when Ben, Linford and Carl got it really competitive and then the 90s saw entire finals fields at or near sub10. So I've only really been waiting for this for 22 years LOL.Edited by: mastermulti
     
  5. white lightning

    white lightning Hall of Famer Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2004
    Messages:
    12,696
    It may have taken 42 years due to alot of bad luck and other things but I guarantee it will happen more often eventually because someone proved it could be done. Just like the 4 minute mile. At one time they though it was impossible until Roger Bannister showed them how it is done. Lemaitre will lead the youth brigade.
     
  6. warhawk46

    warhawk46 Guru

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2010
    Messages:
    119
    Location:
    Milwaukee
    Totally not sprint-related but addressing something earlier in the thread about the myth of black men having larger penises:<div>
    </div><div>The largest ever (John Holmes) was white. The largest now is white (Jonah Falcon). People just see porn stars who are black like Mandigo and think, because they are told by the media, that blacks are bigger.</div><div>
    </div><div>Every penis study ever done has shown that there is no difference in the races, except Asians have slightly smaller ones (but they are generally smaller people too).</div><div>
    </div><div>I think the statistics that show women (of all races) gravitate towards white men tells the true tale.</div>
     
  7. warhawk46

    warhawk46 Guru

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2010
    Messages:
    119
    Location:
    Milwaukee
    William H. Masters and Virginia E. Johnson's 1966 study was the first to address the "phallic fallacy", the mistaken belief that size increase during erection is proportional to flaccid length. In fact, they found that the variation in flaccid size is much larger than variation in erect size and small flaccid penises increase more in size that long flaccid penises. There are men (called "growers") who have a smaller flaccid penis size of for example 3.5" which grow to 6.5" erect, and also men (called "showers") who have a larger flaccid penis size of 5" which only grow 1" to 6" erect. Their average erect size estimate was 5.2".<br style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; "><br style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; ">2) Dr. Wessels published a study in the September 1996<i style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; ">Journal of Urology[/i]concluding that average erect length was 12.9 cm (5.08 in) and that "Neither patient age nor size of the flaccid penis accurately predicted erectile length." Almost 20% of the subjects had erect lengths of less than 4". This is the largest study that is the most modern and scientific.<br style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; "><br style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; ">These studies showed no prediction of erect penis size as based on height, race, or size of hands/feet/flaccid penis size. Black, White, and Asian men were all compared, and no statistically significant difference was found among the races.<br style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; "><br style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; ">Read more:http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_the_average_penis_size_by_race_or_nationality_of_male_human_beings#ixzz1F9S2Urvc</span></span>
     
  8. trackster

    trackster Mentor

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2010
    Messages:
    921
    Gack. I really, really didn't want to read all that when I woke up and checked the track board this morning...
     
  9. waterbed

    waterbed Mentor

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2007
    Messages:
    871
    Location:
    Outside North America
    I feel stupid talking about dicks but that east asian have the same average as whites is an untrue political correct myth
    On T.V I have heard 2 prostitutes say that asian(they meant probably east asian) have significantly smaller length and girth ,and that whites( dutch) and black are the same average when asked after it.
    one of the porstutues said this after asked after black myth.The other answered this after been asked :is there an average?,When she answered it with it depends on asian white etc. she was called racist.

    When Australia become more mulit-cutltural there become more ask for smaller condoms.

    I don't know but I think it is very unlikely that there is no correlation between flaccid and erect at all.A lot of studys are really bad.Pobably they saw that small flaccid grew more in % average and sometimes becomed bigger then the bigger flaccid erect and concluded this lol.I just say this: 7 inch flaccid are very uncommon but exists and there are 2 inch flaccid's.Do you really believe the 7 inch flaccids aren't bigger on average erect then the 2 inch.
    An extreme long penis is not romantic btw becuase then you can't go all in, with space between your bodys LOL
     

Share This Page