Dirrell Sucker Punch

celticdb15

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jul 24, 2007
Messages
8,469
Surprised there hasn't been a thread regarding this weekends colossal meltdown. Check this out.
 

Freethinker

Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 3, 2008
Messages
7,005
Location
Suffolk County, NY
T to the N to tha B.

Low impluse control coupled with little intelligence. The black mans burden.
 

Ambrose

Master
Joined
Feb 23, 2013
Messages
2,630
Location
New York
Dirrel acted this scene out a second time. He was sitting up and looking at the ref hoping for a DQ when flopped on the mat to force the ref's hand. Hitting after the bell is quite common for a second or two during an exchange. Dirrel's uncle dummy ought to know this as well as anyone.
 

white is right

Hall of Famer
Joined
Feb 16, 2006
Messages
10,038
20 or so years ago Luis Santana won 2 championship fights against Terry Norris on the ground after receiving fouls on the back of his head. It seems like Dirrel either has a glass jaw right as the bell rings or has gone to the Luis Santana school of method acting?
 

Westside

Hall of Famer
Joined
Sep 23, 2008
Messages
7,703
Location
So Cal
Dirrel pulled his against Abraham 6 years ago in the Super Six Tournament to get the win. He pulls it again. I said back then that Dirrel will never be the same again. And its true.
 

werewolf

Hall of Famer
Joined
May 6, 2011
Messages
5,997
T to the N to tha B.

Low impluse control coupled with little intelligence. The black mans burden.



1925 US Army War College assessment of Negroes as soldiers:



In the process of evolution the American negro has not progressed as far as the other sub-species of the human family. As a race he has not developed leadership qualities. His mental inferiority and the inherent weaknesses of his character are factors that must be considered with great care in the preparation of any plan for his employment in war. . . .

In the past wars the negro has made a fair laborer, but an inferior technician. As a fighter he has been inferior to the white man even when led by white officers. . . .

Negro soldiers as individuals should not be assigned to white units. . . .

Negro officers should not be placed over white officers, noncommissioned officers or soldiers. . . .

Negro officer candidates should attend training camps with white candidates. They should have the same instructors, take the same tests and meet the same requirements for appointment as officers as the white candidates. They should be sheltered, messed, and instructed separately from white candidates. . . .

. . . the eventual use of the negro will be determined by his performance in combat training and service. . . . If the negro makes good the way is left open for him to go into combat eventually with all-negro units.




Performance of Negro Soldiers in Previous Wars:

It is generally recognized that the pure blood American negro is inferior to our white population in mental capacity. . . . The cranial cavity of the negro is smaller than the white; his brain weighing 35 ounces contrasted with 45 for the white.*

All officers, without exception, agree that the Negro lacks initiative, displays little or no leadership, and cannot accept responsibility. Some point out that these defects are greater in the Southern Negro. . . .

Due to his susceptibility to ‘Crowd Psychology’ a large mass of negroes, e.g., a division, is very subject to panic. Experience had indicated that the negroes produce better results by segregation and cause less trouble. Grouping of negroes generally in the past has produced demands for equality, both during war and after demobilization. . . .

An opinion held in common by practically all officers is that the negro is a rank coward in the dark. His fear of the unknown and unseen will prevent him from ever operating as an individual scout with success. His lack of veracity causes unsatisfactory reports to be rendered, particularly on patrol duty. . . .

One of the peculiarities of the negro as a soldier is that he has no confidence in his negro leaders, nor will he follow a negro officer into battle, no matter how good the officer may be, with the same confidence and lack of fear that he will follow a white man. This last trait has been so universally reported by all commanders that it can not be considered as a theory—the negroes themselves recognize it as a fact. . . .

The negro needs trained leadership far more than the white man needs it, and above all they need leaders in whom they have confidence, and whose presence they can feel and see at all times. . . .

On account of the inherent weaknesses in negro character, especially general lack of intelligence and initiative, it requires much longer time of preliminary training to bring a negro organization up to the point of training where it is fit for combat, than it does in the case of white men. All theoretical training is beyond the grasp of the negro—it must be intensely practical, supplemented by plain talks explaining the reasons for things in simple terms. . . .


* This info in particular is objective, not subjective, as is the simpler more primitive construction of the negro brain as well as its overall size, in particular the parts of the brain that control abstract thought processes, planning, etc. These measurements are now systematically censored.
 
Last edited:
Top