barefoot running?

Jimmy Chitwood

Hall of Famer
Joined
Aug 10, 2005
Messages
8,973
Location
Arkansas
i am positive that we've talked a little about this before, but i couldn't find the thread.

anyway, i stumbled across yet another article discussing this issue recently, and it seems to have a LOT of positives. and it makes sense, too,once you think about it.

i'll post it below, but i was curious what you guys think. has anyone tried it?

Hit the ground running barefoot
by Thea O'Connor
WHEN physiotherapist Michael Warburton recommends barefoot running or walking to runners suffering recurring ankle problems, the typical response is surprise. "Most people expect the opposite: more tape, more strapping and more expensive shoes," says Warburton, who has used barefoot locomotion to strengthen feet for 10 years in his Capalaba, Queensland, practice. "I get good feedback from clients who report less injuries as a result."


From a third to more than half of recreational runners get injured at least once a year, resulting in painful stress fractures, shin splints and achilles tendinitis. This injury rate may suggest humans aren't made for distance running. But perhaps it's the modern running shoe that's not up to the task.


Sharene Hurnen, 43, of Canberra, is one of many distance runners who discovered that kicking off her running shoes allowed her to kick-start her running habit again and remain injury free.


She now loves to run long distances, up to 100km at a time. Four years ago this would have been impossible as Hurnen was plagued by injuries including tendinitis; that, despite following professional advice to try orthotics and wear the heaviest motion control shoe on the market to stop her flat feet over-pronating, or rolling in too far.



Hurnen was advised to give up running, not something she wanted to hear. "When I came across barefoot running on the internet I thought nothing else is working so I'll give it a go," she recalls. "It took me six weeks to toughen up the soles of my feet and retrain myself from striking the ground with my heel, which I used to do when wearing shoes, to striking the ground with the ball or middle of my foot, which is a more comfortable way to run without shoes."


She walked barefoot everywhere and started running a kilometre a day, eventually working up to a 2007 half marathon in which she ran barefoot, experiencing no pain at all.


Three years later Hurnen is still injury free and still running barefoot, except for rocky off-road events when she slips on a thin pair of glove-like shoes, to protect the soles of her feet. "Running barefoot strengthened my feet so they can do what they were designed to do in the first place. It's been a massive revelation to me."


Evolution may explain Hurnen's striking recovery. Humans have been endurance running for millions of years according to evolutionary biologist Dan Lieberman of Harvard University. And they didn't need a pair of Nikes to do so. Until the mid-1970s all humans ran shoeless or in minimal footwear such as sandals, moccasins or thin running flats.


Lieberman's latest research, published in Nature in January, indicates humans are able to do so comfortably and safely by landing with a flat foot, a midfoot strike, or by landing on the ball of the foot before bringing down the heel, a forefoot strike. In contrast, those who wear modern running shoes mainly land on their heels first.


This seemingly small difference in gait, which Lieberman measured in shod and unshod runners from Kenya and the US, makes running much less jarring.


Heel striking generates a rapid high-impact force -- about 1 1/2 to as much as three times the body weight -- the moment the foot collides with the ground. That's equivalent to someone hitting your heel with a hammer using 1 1/2 to three times your body weight. Scientists suspect this spike in force, or impact transient, causes repetitive stress injuries.


Conversely, with a forefoot strike, impact forces increase smoothly throughout the stride with no impact transient. Still, this doesn't prove the running style is less injurious, and flies in the face of popular belief.


Running shoes with pronation-control features and elevated, cushioned heels (PCECH) have been the gold standard for the past 30 years, with many sports medicine professionals prescribing them to help prevent injury.


So Craig Richards, of the University of Newcastle in NSW, rocked the status quo in March last year when he reported in the British Journal of Sports Medicine that there were no studies that found PCECH running shoes reduced injury rates.


Podiatry New Zealand responded by stating consumers would be foolish to believe the study. The release was withdrawn but is indicative of the, well, foothold PCECH running shoes have among health professionals. And it only touches on the ferocity of a debate that has been simmering for decades.


"The sports medicine sector has been prescribing a treatment without proven benefit for close to 30 years," says Richards, who's critical of the integrity of the sports science literature, noting the influence of running shoe companies on sports medicine.


In his paper Richards reveals that a shoe company sponsors the International Federation of Sports Medicine, Podiatry New Zealand and Sports Medicine Australia, and that these organisations recommend the firm's footwear. "In the light of my finding, such recommendations cannot credibly be made."


Sports Medicine Australia president Tim Pain defends the practice. "You have to use the best evidence that's available. There's enough evidence that PCECH shoes reduce the impact forces the foot is under to be able make these recommendations."


Pain acknowledges a lack of research proving that reducing impact forces reduces injury rates. "Barefoot running raises some good questions," Pain says. "It's controversial so [it] makes you question what you are doing, which is good. There's probably a middle ground to the issue."


Warburton doesn't recommend barefoot running to shod runners who aren't having problems. "However, if you've experienced repeated running injuries despite using orthotics and trading up to the best shoe available, going barefoot or running in shoes that make it easier to use a fore-foot or mid-foot strike is definitely worth trying."


Marathon runner Bethany McCarthy, 32, claims she cured shin splints, stress fractures and compartment syndrome -- where muscles bound by connective tissue swell, resulting in a painful increase in pressure -- by using barefoot running to learn how to run with a forefoot strike. "My feet have become stronger and I don't have any problems with over-pronating any more."


She has put shoes back on, this time a shoe without pronation-control features, and has clocked up 13 marathons and four ultra-marathons of 100km each without any foot or calf injuries. She says: "Of all the professional advice I received, no one ever . . . suggested avoiding a heel strike".


Minimal running shoes such as the Vibram FiveFingers shoe and the Dunlop Volley are becoming more popular as a fore or mid-foot strike is much easier without a cushioned, elevated heel. Vibram partly funded Lieberman's study.


Richards is so convinced minimal shoes are the way of the future that he has patented a barefoot running shoe.


He acknowledges that putting anything on the sole of the foot interferes with the sensory feedback loops that help the foot to know where it is in space, which is important for stability and adjusting foot and leg movement to provide natural cushioning. "We're trying to get the right balance between minimising such interference while offering some protection," Richards says.


For those keen to try barefoot running, "go slow" is the message. Just as old bad habits can cause problems, so can new ones that reawaken muscles unused to putting one unshod foot in front of the other.


For more information,visit www.barefootrunning.fas.harvard.edu
 

FootballDad

Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 19, 2009
Messages
5,134
Location
Somewhere near Kansas City, MO
I haven't tried it yet, I'm a bit too much of a "tenderfoot" to attempt it. I've thought about getting the Vibram things so that I can give it a shot, though. One thing that looking into this a couple of years ago did for me, is that it made me conscious of how I run. Many runners/joggers get into a habit of "heel and toe" running, which is unnatural and really bad for your joints, but is encouraged by shoe design. Even not running barefoot, I always run on the balls of my feet, especially when running up and particularly, down hills.
 
Joined
Oct 16, 2004
Messages
363
I have enough background in this to be able to tell people that it boils down to who you are. Barefoot running - or to be safe running in something like Nike 5.0's etc - provides benefits, but it depends on the individual. Lots of fast mid and long distance guys hit mid or even, God forbid, heel first. If you're sprinting, up on your toes, but otherwise, don't worry too much about it. If you doubt me, look at film or video of top runners from past to present. Being on your toes/the balls of your feet for anything over a mile (in terms of racing) is not good. Runners like that tend to have a lot of calf injuries, many times misdiagnosed as problems with the fascia surrounding the calf muscles. Yeah, simplifying it a bit, but think toes for running very fast, and then don't worry too much after that. Most people who think they're coming down heel first are usually more of a midfoot striker, which is fine.
 

Jimmy Chitwood

Hall of Famer
Joined
Aug 10, 2005
Messages
8,973
Location
Arkansas
i found that other thread, and the original article that got me started thinking about this subjectthis piece linked on Lew Rockwell's site i thought i'd re-post it and hearany thoughts of my fellow CFers.


<H1 align=center>The Painful Truth About Trainers: AreRunning Shoes a Waste ofMoney?</H1>
Thrust enhancers, roll bars, microchips...the $20 billion running - shoe industry wants us to believe that the latest technologies will cushion every stride. Yet in this extract from his controversial new book, Christopher McDougall claims that injury rates for runners are actually on the rise, that everything we've been told about running shoes is wrong - and that it might even be better to go barefoot...

by Chrisopher McDougall



At Stanford University, California, two sales representatives from Nike were watching the athletics team practise. Part of their job was to gather feedback from the company's sponsored runners about which shoes they preferred.


Unfortunately, it was proving difficult that day as the runners all seemed to prefer... nothing.



'Didn't we send you enough shoes?' they asked head coach Vin Lananna. They had, he was just refusing to use them.


'I can't prove this,' the well-respected coach told them. 'But I believe that when my runners train barefoot they run faster and suffer fewer injuries.'
Nike sponsored the Stanford team as they were the best of the very best. Needless to say, the reps were a little disturbed to hear that Lananna felt the best shoes they had to offer them were not as good as no shoes at all ...

click the link to read the full article. it's very interesting. and i'd like to hear any thoughts from you guys.
 

Alpha Male

Mentor
Joined
May 22, 2005
Messages
775
Location
California
Sprinting barefoot on sand orsoft grass is a great way to strengthen the ankle and foot. Franco and Arnold were proponents of training barefoot for squats and deadlifts. Why? Because barefoot training allows formore mass force application to the ground without the "cinder block" bubble effect of today's shoes. If you have a safe surface to run on, barefoot training is beneficial to your health and athletic development. Edited by: Alpha Male
 

StarWars

Mentor
Joined
Mar 23, 2009
Messages
1,194
Alpha Male said:
Sprinting barefoot on sand or soft grass is a great way to strengthen the ankle and foot.  Franco and Arnold were proponents of training barefoot for squats and deadlifts.  Why? Because barefoot training allows for more mass force application to the ground without the "cinder block" bubble effect of today's shoes.  If you have a safe surface to run on, barefoot training is beneficial to your health and athletic development. 

On youtube there is a video of Simone Collio running at the beach. 10.06 is his personal best. He said that he worked so hard to get that time that it was like pouring his soul onto a canvas or something. He also said he was drunk when he wrote that though...hahahahah.
 

Europe

Mentor
Joined
Oct 26, 2008
Messages
1,642
There is a new show on Discovery or TLC called "Weird or What". They just had a segment on barefoot runners from the mountains of Mexico. They can run 200 miles in a couple of days. I think the record for them is about 400 in 2 days. They run barefoot or in cheap sandals. The show did an analysis of running in shoes and barefoot and being barefoot puts a lot less stress on the legs, so they think this is one reason they can run so far. They also drink a lot of corn beer before they run.
Check it out. I am sure there are repeats.
 

RB10

Newbie
Joined
Aug 4, 2013
Messages
36
Location
Texas
I do a lot of sprinting in my vibrams five fingers shoes over the past few years, which is as close as you can get without running barefoot. I definitely have noticed a difference in my run times and my foot and calf muscles have gotten stronger from it and it helps clean up your running form.
 

werewolf

Hall of Famer
Joined
May 6, 2011
Messages
5,997
Top