Welcome Back!

Don Wassall · Aug 21, 2006

I see we have some users here finally. A technical problem causedCaste Footballto go offlineFriday and it had to be "repropagated," which is a gradual process. Hopefully everyone will be able to access the site again over the next day or so.

Jimmy Chitwood · Aug 21, 2006

i was wondering what happened... i thought it might have been something on my end until i tried another computer.

it's good news that this single light of reason has returned to its lonely place amongst the PC darkness of the internet.

foreverfree · Aug 21, 2006

Yeah, CF chose a heckuva time to go off - while the mainstream world's favorite Caublanasion (G-d I hate that term, and not just because it rolls off the tounge bad) was putting another *major* feather in his Nike cap.

John

Colonel_Reb · Aug 21, 2006

I am glad its back too! I was wondering how long it might be down. No matter what happens with Tigger, he'll never have half the class of Jack.

Ground Fighter · Aug 21, 2006

I figured there were technical problems going on. Either that, or big brother shut this site down and was issuing bench warrants for all of us. lol.

white lightning · Aug 21, 2006

That ruined my weekend Don.

It really was discouraging to not be able to post or read other peoples posts.This is by far my favorite site.You should do another collection Don at the first of the year to help keep up with costs.All I can say now is, Let's get ready for some football!

White Shogun · Aug 21, 2006

Ground Fighter said:
Either that, or big brother shut this site down and was issuing bench warrants for all of us. lol.

That sh*t ain't funny, Ground Fighter!!!

white tornado · Aug 21, 2006

Im not joking I bet the C.I.A. and mossod have files on all of us, and I bet one day they will shut down this site and never let it come back.

Bart · Aug 21, 2006

white tornado said:
Im not joking I bet the C.I.A. and mossod have files on all of us, and I bet one day they will shut down this site and never let it come back.

I wouldn't doubt it in the least. The internet has become my main source of information. Far too many people have been getting their eyes opened to the true state of affairs. A legislator will offer some type of bill to curb the proliferation of so-called hate sites and we will be up a creek without a paddle.

Realgeorge · Aug 21, 2006

Bart said:
white tornado said:

Im not joking I bet the C.I.A. and mossod have files on all of us, and I bet one day they will shut down this site and never let it come back.

Click to expand...

I wouldn't doubt it in the least. The internet has become my main source of information.

Well, Gents, let's enjoy it while we can! Furthermore ... it will be a lot harder than it looks to shut down the internet and cherry-pick victims for removal. Sure won't happen on George-the-Twit's watch. Maybe President Hillary will succeed in sending us all to the hoosegow

Don Wassall · Aug 21, 2006

This site is "controversial" but only because its point of view is unique. It's still a long way from being a so-called "hate" site. That's why it's so important to be smart about the way we present our facts and opinions. There's no reason it should ever be shut down unless the Internet becomes very heavily censored by thefedgov and/or Big Business.

white lightning · Aug 21, 2006

I agree Don.It's a far cry from a hate site.We celebrate our european heritage here and only ask that our people be treated fair in sports.There shouldn't ever be a legitimate reason to shut this site down.We are like W.Disney compared to the real hate sites and alot of them are not run by whites.

Guest · Aug 21, 2006

white tornado said:
Im not joking I bet the C.I.A. and mossod have files on all of us, and I bet one day they will shut down this site and never let it come back.

I have a safe house in southern GA you're welcome to use.

Bart · Aug 22, 2006

Don Wassall said:
This site is "controversial" but only because its point of view is unique. It's still a long way from being a so-called "hate" site.

This site is light years away from being a hate site, we all would agree. However, in the present climate even mild criticisms can be construed as hate if the wrong people or groups are offended. The Prof. from Harvard (Ignatiev)?who advocates the extermination of the white race will never be in jeopardy. The Mexican Prof. who debatedJared Taylor is a Reconquistador who has made many anti -white statements in the past,but he also gets a free pass. Both of them are secure in their positions being handsomely paid by the government. The problem we face is simple.Those in postions of authority who determine what hate is or is not... hate us.

GWTJ · Aug 22, 2006

Glad to have Caste Football back also. It seemed like the internet was half empty without this site. Nice to have the universe back in order.

Ta Waki Mumba · Aug 22, 2006

Caste Football is not a hate site but neither is it a place for the thin-skinned. Here we deal with issues that make most people uncomfortable but learned a long time ago that just because I don't like something doesn't mean that I should run away from it.

Never be afraid to state your opinion but always be prepared to explain why you hold that opinion.

JD074 · Aug 24, 2006

Bart said:
The Prof. from Harvard (Ignatiev)?Ã‚Â who advocates the extermination of the white race will never be in jeopardy.

Except that he's against Zionism, so even he better watch his back.

Ground Fighter · Aug 25, 2006

Actually, I wasn't kidding about the whole 'being watched thing'. We probably ARE the potential target of a takedown at some point, even though we've done nothing wrong. And in reality, the only thing we are guilty of is voicing our opinions. The last time I checked, that was still LEGAL. But with the way things are going...who knows.

Rise · Aug 25, 2006

Maybe we need a contingency plan in place if this ever happens. Where should we all post if this site ever does get shut down? I would presume if this board ever gets shut down so would the ANU board.

White Shogun · Aug 25, 2006

Rise said:
Maybe we need a contingency plan in place if this ever happens. Where should we all post if this site ever does get shut down? I would presume if this board ever gets shut down so would the ANU board.

Well, it may be a good idea to have a backup plan, but discussing it and announcing it on the web probably isn't a good idea.

Rise · Aug 25, 2006

We'll create a diversion then, lets all post at blackplanet.com

Edited by: Rise

voice · Aug 25, 2006

This board won't be shutdown. This is a pure free speech right. We aren't advocating any violence or even discrimination toward any other group, just fair treatment for our group. If anything, the caste system's days are numbered!!

The only threat someone could possibly have is by posting real name and working for a PC company and impacting career/job.

For Christsakes, we only want whites not be discrimanated against. They don't call in the feds for that.

White Shogun · Aug 25, 2006

voice said:
This board won't be shutdown. This is a pure free speech right. We aren't advocating any violence or even discrimination toward any other group, just fair treatment for our group. If anything, the caste system's days are numbered!!

The only threat someone could possibly have is by posting real name and working for a PC company and impacting career/job.

For Christsakes, we only want whites not be discrimanated against. They don't call in the feds for that.

Voice, you don't live in Merry Olde England, do you?

http://www.bnp.org.uk/news_detail.php?newsId=1101

British National Party, August 23, 2006

In the last few weeks the entire nature of the laws that regulate the internet have fundamentally changed. Though the Police have long had the power to prosecute people for their actions on the Internet they have in the past been unwilling to do so. This policy began to change last year when individuals were prosecuted and jailed for posting information on a website that was considered to be part of a campaign of racial harassment.

Since then two individuals have been charged with crimes related specifically to posting illegal information on the internet. Mr. Simon Sheppard has been charged with ten counts of "Incitement to Racial Hatred" and Mr. Luke O'Farrell with two counts even though the website of Mr. Sheppard is hosted in the United States. This means that those individuals who post information on forums, bulletin boards and websites hosted in the US, can now be prosecuted for incitement to racial hatred, incitement to violence and glorification of terrorism in the United Kingdom.

The time limit on the nature of what is considered as 'terror' is not specified, so includes those who glorify the 1916 Easter Uprising , the Bolshevik Revolution, the Nazi era and Islamist violence worldwide.

British Law Against Glorifying Terrorism Has Not Silenced Calls To Kill For Islam

Souad Mekhennet and Dexter Filkins, New York Times, August 21, 2006

LondonÃ¢â‚¬â€From his home on the northwest edge of this city, Muhamad al-Massari runs a Web site that celebrates the violent death of British and American soldiers. It is visited by tens of thousands of people every day, he said.

Mr. Massari maintains the Arabic-language site, tajdeed.org.uk, in the face of a strict new law aimed at curtailing violent speech and publishing. Just last week, the Council of Holy Warriors, a group affiliated with Al Qaeda, posted a declaration on the site praising a suicide bombing in Iraq that killed or wounded 55 people.

"If you kill our civilians, we kill your civilians," Mr. Massari declared during an interview.

Mr. Massari's Web site, and his public remarks, appear to violate of the Antiterrorism Act of 2006, which makes it a crime to glorify or encourage political violence. Inciting violence has long been illegal here but the new rules, drawn up after the London subway and bus bombings in July 2005, are intended to be much tougher.

The law's underlying assumption is that speeches and publications by Britain's more extreme Islamists may play a role in leading disgruntled young men toward violence. In addition to banning speech that encourages terrorism, the new law also criminalizes reckless speech that may have the same effect.

British law against glorifying terrorism

Ground Fighter · Aug 25, 2006

White Shogun,

I told you I was serious about the whole 'big brother' thing, and now I got everyone thinking about what could really be going on behind closed doors. And the article you posted doesn't surprise me either. Soon it will be illegal to even think the word "ni**er" in your head.

The "powers that be" are probably sitting in a board-room somewhere right now, with pics and files of all of us tacked up on a blackboard.

White Shogun · Aug 26, 2006

Ground Fighter said:
I told you I was serious about the whole 'big brother' thing, and now I got everyone thinking about what could really be going on behind closed doors.

Many of us here at CF have been aware of the government's shift toward tyranny for some time. Glad to have you aboard the train, Ground Fighter.

Welcome Back!

Administrator

Hall of Famer

Mentor

Hall of Famer

Mentor

Hall of Famer

Hall of Famer

Mentor

Hall of Famer

Mentor

Administrator

Hall of Famer

Guest

Guest

Hall of Famer

Mentor

Guru

Master

Mentor

Guru

Hall of Famer

Guru

Guru

Hall of Famer

Mentor

Hall of Famer