Congresswoman Giffords shot, maybe killed, by gunm

Anne Coulter and Laura Ingraham are both disgraceful b*****s, they promote their so-called conservative agendas, but don't have the time to have a "real" family. That's ZERO white babies between these two and there are plenty more of their CHILDLESS types out there on BOTH political spectrum. In truth, they're ultra FemiNAZIs!!!!

Sarah Palin and Nancy Pelosi are disgraceful morons too, but at least they have large and white families. MISGUIDED children they are though, no thanks to their parents.

It's already annoying that the liberal media has it's ideal fall guy to paint it's definition and portrait of evil... the anarchist WHITE GUY. Forget the fact that "many times" more violent crimes are committed by blacks and Mexican Hispanics alike. Edited by: j41181

j41181 said:

Anne Coulter and Laura Ingraham are both disgraceful b*****s, they promote their so-called conservative agendas, but don't have the time to have a "real" family. That's ZERO white babies between these two and there are plenty more of their CHILDLESS types out there on BOTH political spectrum. In truth, they're ultra FemiNAZIs!!!!

Click to expand...

If these two women are "ultra" FemiNAZI's, what superlatives do you have in store for the really, really nasty women?

Coulter and Ingraham are pretty pathetic when it comes to backing up their "conservative values" with action. Personally, I can't stand to listen to either one of them talk. Their voices are very grating to my ears, sort of like fingernails on a chalkboard. Same way with Pawn Vanity and Michael Savage. Horrible radio voices and neo-con shills all.

Ann Coulter may have a condition that is rare but not unheard of (Jamie Lee Curtis has the same thing) where they are female but have some genetic defects and do not have a fully developed uterus/other female things. "Women" with this syndrome tend to be very tall, slim, with thick hair, and are often attractive and become models. If this is true it would certainly explain the no children thing and would also explain any avoidance of conventional relationships. She seems to fit the disease description in other ways too.

Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome

http://www.secondtype.info/ais.htm

Observer said:

j41181 said:

Anne Coulter and Laura Ingraham are both disgraceful b*****s, they promote their so-called conservative agendas, but don't have the time to have a "real" family. That's ZERO white babies between these two and there are plenty more of their CHILDLESS types out there on BOTH political spectrum. In truth, they're ultra FemiNAZIs!!!!

Click to expand...

If these two women are "ultra" FemiNAZI's, what superlatives do you have in store for the really, really nasty women?

Click to expand...

He was likely suggesting that "conservative"Â￾ pundits are even more wretched than their "liberal"Â￾ counterparts due to their insincere existence. (Note â€" they are all anti-white, and thus, are all "liberal"Â￾).

Naturally, the same can be said for "El Rushbo,"Â￾ who has been married to four separate white women"¦and yet has zero white children.

Please, Rush, show the "liberals"Â￾ and members of the "drive by media"Â￾ how to live your selfish, meaningless, hypocritical, pill-popping, money-oriented, "conservative"Â￾ life!

So many of these "far right"Â￾ Talking-Machines can't even manage their own lives"¦they certainly aren't fit to bestow their "sage"Â￾ advice to the already-bastardized white masses.

You are right of course, those "conservative" personalities are just another tool to destroy the white race and white civilization. Has any conservative personality come out and quoted Thomas Jefferson that "original" Republican: "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."

Menelik said:

<div>Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome</font></font></div>
<div>http://www.secondtype.info/ais.htm</div>

Click to expand...

If anyone is bored I suggest this link. It's fascinating. I had never heard of this.

As usual, TPTB are shifting public focus off of the shooting itself, and onto the suitably nutty lone gunman and the tragic victims. There are a myriad of strange elements to this story. For one, there are no photos or video of the event, which can perhaps be explained away as being too gruesome for public release (althought that never stopped such things from being released before). However, where are the photos and/or video of the event, prior to the shooting? Surely, some citizen took a picture of the congresswoman, or filmed something on their cell phone, before the mayhem ensued.

In reality, the only "evidence" that this event took place at all are the mainstream media reports-with all their typical inconsistencies- that tell us it did. Surely, the obscene, totally inappropriate memorial service for the victims, lorded over by a clearly campaigning Obama, should have been enough to raise the doubts of all Americans. 14,000 tee shirts? What kind of "memorial" was ever like this? In reality, this was more akin to a pep rally. It certainly was dramatic when Obama broke from his teleprompter to breathlessly tell the throngs that "Gabby just opened her eyes for the first time."

Pay close attention to the actual facts about this alleged event. Look at that ridiculous mug shot, with the shaved head and the maniacal, conviction-assuring grin. Then remember that the artist's drawing of the same suspect, taken AFTER this mug shot, showed him with a full head of hair. How does that happen? Then there is the original 911 call-widely available on the internet-which reveals that the person calling it in was reporting that the shooter "ran north" from the scene. Big problem there- we've been told that Loughner was tackled at the scene.

Finally, the most interesting tidbit yet; the 59 year old woman who brought 9 year old Christina Green to the event, Susan Hileman, was an alumnus of the Human Ecology Project at Cornell University. That odious project was one of the biggest CIA-sponsored "research" programs into mind control and brainwashing. I think that might explain why the biologically unrelated 59 year old "neighbor" somehow became such good friends with a 9 year old girl. What parents wouldn't be suspicious of such a relationship?

The media and politicians are exploiting this tragedy to the hilt, blaming all the usual suspects, while at the same time bemoaning the "finger pointing" others allegedly do too frequently. Meanwhile, Loughner's strident atheism, public desire to become a woman and the occult alter (complete with human skull) in his backyard are not quite garnering as much media attention. Considering the curious background of the woman who took the little girl to the event, and Loughner's obvious, sterotypically MKULTRA-style personna, there's a lot there to investigate, if only we had some honest journalists.

Regardless of the true nature of this event, there is no question that the TPTB will use this tragedy to foist more awful legislation on the American people.

I'm really tired of the constant TV coverage of Rep. Giffords. I wish her the best in her recovery, but enough is enough.

Van_Slyke_CF said:

I'm really tired of the constant TV coverage of Rep. Giffords. I wish her the best in her recovery, but enough is enough.

Click to expand...

Ditto here.

Just as some here suspected, here it comes again, as if on cue...

http://content.usatoday.com/communi...here-is-more-we-can-do-to-stop-gun-violence/1
<h3>Obama seeks to re-open gun control debate after Tucson shootings</h3>Two months after the mass shooting in Arizona, President Obama is
calling for better background checks on gun buyers and suggesting that
more gun control legislation may be needed.

"Clearly, there's more we can do to prevent gun violence," Obama said in an op-ed for the Arizona Daily Star
in Tucson, site of the Jan. 8 shooting that killed six and wounded 13,
including Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, D-Ariz. "But I want this to at least
be the beginning of a new discussion on how we can keep America safe for
all our people." (urge everyone to own and carry firearms would be a great start! more gun control certainly won't help)


Obama did not offer specifics, but did anticipate the political difficulties of enacting new gun legislation.

"Some
will say that anything short of the most sweeping anti-gun legislation
is a capitulation to the gun lobby," Obama wrote, while "others will
predictably cast any discussion as the opening salvo in a wild-eyed
scheme to take away everybody's guns."

But Obama expressed
confidence that "most gun-control advocates know that most gun owners
are responsible citizens" and that "most gun owners know that the word
'commonsense' isn't a code word for 'confiscation.''' (not this one!)


"None
of us should be willing to remain passive in the face of violence or
resigned to watching helplessly as another rampage unfolds on
television," Obama wrote. (no, instead we should willingly sacrifice our freedom at the expense of "security")


The president did not mention accused
Tuscon shooter Jared Loughner by name, but wrote that "a man our Army
rejected as unfit for service; a man one of our colleges deemed too
unstable for studies; a man apparently bent on violence, was able to
walk into a store and buy a gun."

In calling for better background checks, Obama wrote:

--
"The National Instant Criminal Background Check System is the filter
that's supposed to stop the wrong people from getting their hands on a
gun. Bipartisan legislation four years ago was supposed to strengthen
this system, but it hasn't been properly implemented."

-- "We should in fact reward the states that provide the best data - and therefore do the most to protect our citizens." (FedGov incentives (or even penalties for those that don't) to the states that become the most like Big Brother)


--
"We should provide an instant, accurate, comprehensive and consistent
system for background checks to sellers who want to do the right thing,
and make sure that criminals can't escape it." (What a joke! how many criminals are going to go through legal means to obtain weapons?)

It was a matter of time before the phony "liberals" leveraged the AZ shooting to re-attack on 2nd Amendment rights.

Awfully predictable there, Col.

That's funny, whenever "everyday whites"Â￾ are shot by black street vermin, the subject of altering gun control legislation is never broached.

"Normal"Â￾ whites are nothing but a mere statistic.